Gerhard Häring wrote:
> Robin Haswell wrote:
>
>>>I've still got some decisions to make such as FastCGI vs mod_python -
>>>anybody have the pro's and con's between these two?
>>
>>My experience with setting up shared hosts tells me this: FastCGI is
>>slow but works with SuEXEC so is secure. mod_python is fast but all
>>processes run as the Apache user - draw your own conclusions from this.
>
>
> Not considering benchmarks of "hello-world" style apps, is
> FastCGI/SCGI/mod_proxy really noticably slower than using mod_python for
> real applications?
My experience is really only with PHP, where the statup times are quite
high (PHP doesn't have the concept of runtime module selection as such).
However I can't imagine any situations where FCGID would be quicker than
mod_python, as mod_python's python interpreter runs within the Apache
process itself.
>
>
>>What really solves the problem is the Apache Perchild MPM - mod_* speed
>>with suexec capabilities. Unfortunately for some unfathomable reason
>>perchild isn't finished and isn't being developed :'( [...]
>
>
> Apparently developing something like the Apache perchild MPM is hard.
> Because it didn't get fixed and it had several problems, it got finally
> scrapped in Apache 2.2.
>
> There were/are several attempts to develop a replacment, none of them
> ready for production yet, according to their developers:
>
> metuxmpm: http://www.sannes.org/metuxmpm/
> itk mpm: http://home.samfundet.no/~sesse/mpm-itk/
> peruser mpm: http://www.telana.com/peruser.php
>
> -- Gerhard
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to turbogears@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
