I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to be sure that each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We also need to work out what to do to take account of the clarification to the OSOA license that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need to be changed to be in line with.
Kelvin. On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about what is > appropriate to fix there. > > Regards, > Amita > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and > > > keeping > > > ref. to the > > > old mail thread - > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where small > updates > > > can > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else. > > > > > > 1) why on > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > have - > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you are talking > about > > the transition from ... > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > to > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the "general" menu and > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is entitled "SDO > > Java > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" page from the > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that this page is > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we used to have > our > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has accidentally > been > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the wiki change > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > 2) changes in > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two separate ideas that > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail new features > on > > the FAQ page. > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same name > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on properties where > > > 'isMany' is true > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other posting is that > the > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't ever "released" the > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. SDO > > implementers > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think what we want > to > > do > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done before, for the > SDO > > Java runtime. > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs useful as > > part > > > of > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place for this. > > > > 3) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.html page > does > > > not have menu > > > > > > Good point > > > > 4) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib project and the > > tools-test project > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.html no menu and > old > > > structure > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api project into the > > main > > sdo trunk > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new content from the > sca > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by wiki include > > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks into out own > > guide. > > > > 7) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html again no > > > menu > > > can refer to > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? (like shows > > all > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not sure why it's > wrong > > in firefox though. > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that I think is > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on the left > menu > > on > > > this page : > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > it's > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > great > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong styles : > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > fine > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of these things up. > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would like me to > > do? > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than welcome to pitch > > in > > too. > > > > Kelvin. > > > > Regards, > > > Amita > > > > > >
