Here's how I did it for the last release http://people.apache.org/~kelvingoodson/sdo_java/1.0-incubating/RC4/
See the rat_exceptions.txt file Kelvin. On 18/01/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Amita, > > Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these > categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF files must > me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted in the > release vote that thess files have been left as they are for this reason. > You can see this kind of thing in Tuscany-1171, and in previous release > vote threads, where the RAT report is manually marked up. > > Kelvin. > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the xml files > > under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the > > last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. > > > > Regards, > > Amita > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to be sure > > > that > > > each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We also > > need > > > to > > > work out what to do to take account of the clarification to the OSOA > > > license > > > that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need to be > > > changed > > > to be in line with. > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > > > > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > > > > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about what > > is > > > > appropriate to fix there. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubatingand > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > ref. to the > > > > > > old mail thread - > > > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where small > > > > > > updates > > > > > > can > > > > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else. > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) why on > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > > > > have - > > > > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you are > > talking > > > > about > > > > > the transition from ... > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > > > > to > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > > > > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the "general" menu > > and > > > > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is entitled > > "SDO > > > > > Java > > > > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" page > > from > > > the > > > > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that this > > page > > > is > > > > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we used to > > have > > > > our > > > > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has > > accidentally > > > > been > > > > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the wiki > > change > > > > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > > > > > > > 2) changes in > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two separate > > ideas > > > that > > > > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail new > > > features > > > > on > > > > > the FAQ page. > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same name > > > > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on properties > > > where > > > > > > 'isMany' is true > > > > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other posting is > > that > > > > the > > > > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't > > ever "released" > > > the > > > > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. SDO > > > > > implementers > > > > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think what we > > want > > > > to > > > > > do > > > > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done before, for > > the > > > > SDO > > > > > Java runtime. > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > > > > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs > > useful as > > > > > part > > > > > > of > > > > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place for this. > > > > > > > > > > 3) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlpage > > > > does > > > > > > not have menu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point > > > > > > > > > > 4) > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib project and > > the > > > > > tools-test project > > > > > > > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.html no menu > > and > > > > old > > > > > > structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api project into > > the > > > > > main > > > > > sdo trunk > > > > > > > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new content from > > the > > > > sca > > > > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by wiki > > include > > > > > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks into > > out > > > own > > > > > guide. > > > > > > > > > > 7) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.htmlagain > > > no > > > > > > menu > > > > > > can refer to > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? (like > > > shows > > > > > all > > > > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not sure why > > it's > > > > wrong > > > > > in firefox though. > > > > > > > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that > > I think > > > is > > > > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > > > > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on the > > left > > > > menu > > > > > on > > > > > > this page : > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > > > > it's > > > > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong styles : > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fine > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of these > > things > > > up. > > > > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would like > > me > > > to > > > > > do? > > > > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than welcome to > > > pitch > > > > > in > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
