Hi, I am going through all the samples to see if there are any areas of improvement, If anybody has spotted some areas or have some suggestions, please explain the details.
Regards, Amita On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 PM, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about having an IRC on 4th Feb ,Monday, 7.30 a.m. PST? Please feel > free to suggest another time if this is not > convenient. > > Regards, > Amita > > > On Jan 29, 2008 4:55 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was hoping to have done a full pass through the JIRAs to be sure we > > cover > > the most important ones. Maybe it would be good to schedule an IRC chat > > to > > get community input on what is important. We could go through each of > > the > > open JIRAs and see how people rate the importance and who would step up > > to > > fixing things. That way we'd get a better picture of what's wanted. > > When > > would be a good time to do this? > > > > Kelvin. > > > > On 25/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have worked on the comments for RAT report and added the results at > > the > > > end of - > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report. So > > > shall > > > I go > > > ahead and correct the 9 files mentioned there to include Apache > > header in > > > them? > > > > > > Also, what is the best way to ensure that the Ex:3rd do contain the > > > correct > > > license text? > > > Any old mail ref. or any other documentation? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Amita > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 5:14 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Amita, > > > > > > > > Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these > > > > categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF > > files > > > > must > > > > me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted in > > the > > > > release vote that thess files have been left as they are for this > > > reason. > > > > You can see this kind of thing in Tuscany-1171, and in previous > > release > > > > vote threads, where the RAT report is manually marked up. > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the xml > > > files > > > > > under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the > > > > > last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to > > be > > > sure > > > > > > that > > > > > > each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We > > also > > > > need > > > > > > to > > > > > > work out what to do to take account of the clarification to the > > OSOA > > > > > > license > > > > > > that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need to > > be > > > > > > changed > > > > > > to be in line with. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > > > > > > > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > > > > > > > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about > > what > > > > is > > > > > > > appropriate to fix there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java > > > > 1.1-incubatingand > > > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > > ref. to the > > > > > > > > > old mail thread - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > > > > > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where > > > small > > > > > > > updates > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > > > > > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) why on > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > > > > > > > have - > > > > > > > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you are > > > > talking > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > the transition from ... > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the > > "general" > > > menu > > > > > and > > > > > > > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is > > > entitled > > > > > "SDO > > > > > > > > Java > > > > > > > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" > > page > > > > from > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that > > this > > > > > page > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we > > used > > > to > > > > > have > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has > > > > accidentally > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the > > wiki > > > > > change > > > > > > > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) changes in > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > > > > > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two > > separate > > > > ideas > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail > > new > > > > > > features > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > the FAQ page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same > > name > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on > > > properties > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > 'isMany' is true > > > > > > > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other > > posting is > > > > > that > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't ever > > > > "released" > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. > > SDO > > > > > > > > implementers > > > > > > > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think > > what > > > we > > > > > want > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done > > > before, for > > > > > the > > > > > > > SDO > > > > > > > > Java runtime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > > > > > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs > > > > useful > > > > > as > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > > > > > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place for > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlpage > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > not have menu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > > > > > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib project > > and > > > > the > > > > > > > > tools-test project > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.htmlno > > > menu > > > > > and > > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api > > project > > > into > > > > > the > > > > > > > > main > > > > > > > > sdo trunk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > > > > > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new > > content > > > from > > > > > the > > > > > > > sca > > > > > > > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by > > wiki > > > > > include > > > > > > > > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks > > into > > > > out > > > > > > own > > > > > > > > guide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.htmlagain > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > > > can refer to > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > > > > > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > > > > > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? > > > (like > > > > > > shows > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not sure > > why > > > > it's > > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > in firefox though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that > > I > > > > think > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > > > > > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on > > the > > > > left > > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > this page : > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > > > > > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > > > > > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong > > styles > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of > > these > > > > things > > > > > > up. > > > > > > > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would > > > like > > > > me > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > do? > > > > > > > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than > > welcome > > > to > > > > > > pitch > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
