Looking at the rat report now.  I'll edit it direct if that's appropriate.
KElvin.

On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also,
> I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at -
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report
> Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments about what is
> appropriate to fix there.
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
> > > keeping
> > > ref. to the
> > > old mail thread -
> > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html.
> > > I am starting a new thread now.
> > >
> > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places where small
> updates
> > > can
> > > be done. Please give your comments
> > > if these seem fine or need something more/something else.
> > >
> > > 1) why on
> > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe
> > > have -
> > > Open CSA (SCA Standards)
> >
> >
> > This is confusing and needs investigating.  I think you are talking
> about
> > the transition from ...
> > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html
> > to
> > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html
> >
> > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the "general" menu and
> > therefore  is general to Tuscany.  However,  the page is entitled "SDO
> > Java
> > Get Involved",  yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" page from the
> > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact that this page is
> > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany".  I'm sure we used to have
> our
> > own SDO Java getting involved page,  and I think it has accidentally
> been
> > overwritten at some stage.  I guess we need to look at the wiki change
> > history and see if we can recover it.
> >
> > 2) changes in
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor
> > > new features, improvements
> >
> >
> > I'm a bit confused here.  I think maybe you have two separate ideas that
> > have been merged perhaps.  I don't think we want to detail new features
> on
> > the FAQ page.
> >
> > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API
> > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same name
> > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on properties where
> > > 'isMany' is true
> > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest
> >
> >
> > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other posting is that
> the
> > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release.  We haven't ever  "released" the
> > CTS,  since  it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so.  SDO
> > implementers
> > who want to use the CTS can download the source.  I think what we want
> to
> > do
> > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done before,  for the
> SDO
> > Java runtime.
> >
> > Is there anything else from
> > >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project
> > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned JIRAs useful as
> > part
> > > of
> > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will
> > > be sufficient?
> >
> >
> > I see now.  Yes, release notes are definitely the place for this.
> >
> > 3) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.html page
> does
> > > not have menu
> >
> >
> >  Good point
> >
> > 4) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno
> > > menu , old structure
> >
> >
> > you are right,  we need to add a section for the lib project and the
> > tools-test project
> >
> > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.html no menu and
> old
> > > structure
> >
> >
> >  again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api project into the
> > main
> > sdo trunk
> >
> > 6) developer guide - should we refer to
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland
> > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete?
> >
> >
> >  I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new content from the
> sca
> > guide into an sdo guide.  If the SCA guide is built up by wiki include
> > directives, there may be scope for including generic chunks into out own
> > guide.
> >
> > 7) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html again no
> > > menu
> > > can refer to
> > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html
> > >
> > > 8) TUSCANY-1026
> > > Also, why
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html
> > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as html? (like shows
> > all
> > > html tags etc.)
> >
> >
> > I think this is a firefox issue.  It's fine in IE. Not sure why it's
> wrong
> > in firefox though.
> >
> > Can we provide this link in
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html
> >
> >
> > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content that I  think is
> > already in the site.  It certainly was at one time.
> >
> > 9) TUSCANY-1531
> > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available on the left
> menu
> > on
> > > this page :
> http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html
> > > It should probably be listed/visible from :
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas
> > > it's
> > > one of the pages with more contents on it.
> > > looks like is fixed.
> >
> >
> > great
> >
> > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong styles :
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html
> >
> >
> > fine
> >
> > Thanks Amita for this useful review.  I'll pick some of these things up.
> > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you would like me to
> > do?
> > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than welcome to pitch
> > in
> > too.
> >
> > Kelvin.
> >
> > Regards,
> > > Amita
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to