Hi, When confirming for correctness of 3rd party license text, I checked the below thread - 1]http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg05115.html and got in summary the below guidelines -
Treatment of Third-Party Works 1. The term "third-party work" refers to a work not submitted directly to the ASF by the copyright owner or owner's agent. 2. Do not modify or remove any copyright notices or licenses within third-party works. 3. Do ensure that every third-party work includes its associated license, even if that requires adding a copy of the license from the third-party download site into the distribution. 4. Do not add the standard Apache License header to the top of third-party source files. 5. Minor modifications/additions to third-party source files should typically be licensed under the same terms as the rest of the rest of the third-party source for convenience. 6. Major modifications/additions to third-party should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis by the PMC. But still have a few questions about 3rd party license headers in the context of below mail thread and findings - ML thread:- 2]http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03314.html Findings:- in tuscany-sdo-api-r2.1 1> HelperProvider and NoHelperProviderException have ASF license and in test in same project - 2>HelperProviderTestCase has (looks like some old IBM+ASF license), DefaultHelperProvider, TCCL1HelperProvider have ASF licenses, These findings are a bit confusing against mail thread 2]. Also when checked Luciano's work on DAS in JIRA-620 for license headers it is all for ASF licenses as DAS does not contain any 3rd party code. So, will you please see if there are some changes required in 1> and 2>? Regards, Amita On Jan 31, 2008 5:52 PM, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I am going through all the samples to see if there are any areas of > improvement, If anybody has spotted some areas or have some > suggestions, please explain the details. > > Regards, > Amita > > > On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 PM, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > How about having an IRC on 4th Feb ,Monday, 7.30 a.m. PST? Please feel > > free to suggest another time if this is not > > convenient. > > > > Regards, > > Amita > > > > > > On Jan 29, 2008 4:55 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > I was hoping to have done a full pass through the JIRAs to be sure we > > > cover > > > the most important ones. Maybe it would be good to schedule an IRC > > > chat to > > > get community input on what is important. We could go through each of > > > the > > > open JIRAs and see how people rate the importance and who would step > > > up to > > > fixing things. That way we'd get a better picture of what's wanted. > > > When > > > would be a good time to do this? > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > On 25/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I have worked on the comments for RAT report and added the results > > > at the > > > > end of - > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report. > > > So > > > > shall > > > > I go > > > > ahead and correct the 9 files mentioned there to include Apache > > > header in > > > > them? > > > > > > > > Also, what is the best way to ensure that the Ex:3rd do contain the > > > > correct > > > > license text? > > > > Any old mail ref. or any other documentation? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 5:14 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Amita, > > > > > > > > > > Anything unmarked needs checking to see if it fits one of these > > > > > categories. I only did the ones I marked up from memory. Ex:IFF > > > files > > > > > must > > > > > me ignored, but it must be clear from the rat report submitted in > > > the > > > > > release vote that thess files have been left as they are for this > > > > reason. > > > > > You can see this kind of thing in Tuscany-1171, and in previous > > > release > > > > > vote threads, where the RAT report is manually marked up. > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the action for Ex.IFF - ignore? Also what TBD for the > > > xml > > > > files > > > > > > under sdo-tools-test which do not contain headers - i.e. the > > > > > > last section from RAT Report - Unresolved. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 4:35 PM, kelvin goodson < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've marked up the Unresolved section. There's a job to do to > > > be > > > > sure > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > each of the instances marked with Ex:TCR is actually such. We > > > also > > > > > need > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > work out what to do to take account of the clarification to > > > the OSOA > > > > > > > license > > > > > > > that happened recently, that the files marked Ex:3rd may need > > > to be > > > > > > > changed > > > > > > > to be in line with. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Kelvin, will look at all these points. Also, > > > > > > > > I used rat-5.0.jar and got the report at - > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/RAT+Report > > > > > > > > Please see "Unresolved" section in it and give comments > > > about what > > > > > is > > > > > > > > appropriate to fix there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 18, 2008 3:56 PM, kelvin goodson < > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java > > > > > 1.1-incubatingand > > > > > > > > > > keeping > > > > > > > > > > ref. to the > > > > > > > > > > old mail thread - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg27168.html. > > > > > > > > > > I am starting a new thread now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Web Site documentation:- I could gather a few places > > > where > > > > small > > > > > > > > updates > > > > > > > > > > can > > > > > > > > > > be done. Please give your comments > > > > > > > > > > if these seem fine or need something more/something > > > else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) why on > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.htmlwe > > > > > > > > > > have - > > > > > > > > > > Open CSA (SCA Standards) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is confusing and needs investigating. I think you > > > are > > > > > talking > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > the transition from ... > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java.html > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-get-involved.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In which case the "Get Involved" is a link from the > > > "general" > > > > menu > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > therefore is general to Tuscany. However, the page is > > > > entitled > > > > > > "SDO > > > > > > > > > Java > > > > > > > > > Get Involved", yet seems identical to the "Get Involved" > > > page > > > > > from > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > Tuscany Home page's Community menu apart from the fact > > > that this > > > > > > page > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > entitled "Getting Involved: Apache Tuscany". I'm sure we > > > used > > > > to > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > own SDO Java getting involved page, and I think it has > > > > > accidentally > > > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > overwritten at some stage. I guess we need to look at the > > > wiki > > > > > > change > > > > > > > > > history and see if we can recover it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) changes in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlfor > > > > > > > > > > new features, improvements > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit confused here. I think maybe you have two > > > separate > > > > > ideas > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > have been merged perhaps. I don't think we want to detail > > > new > > > > > > > features > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > the FAQ page. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1468 - Use HelperContext for scope in Tuscany API > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1128 - Support attribute and element with same > > > name > > > > > > > > > > TUSCANY-1359 - New SDOUtil: Upper and lower bound on > > > > properties > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > 'isMany' is true > > > > > > > > > > CTS TUSCANY-1230 - Improvements to TypeConversionTest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Something I meant to mention in regards to your other > > > posting is > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > CTS is not part of an SDO Java release. We haven't ever > > > > > "released" > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > CTS, since it's never yet seemed to make sense to do so. > > > SDO > > > > > > > > > implementers > > > > > > > > > who want to use the CTS can download the source. I think > > > what > > > > we > > > > > > want > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > here is a respin of the kind of release we have done > > > > before, for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > SDO > > > > > > > > > Java runtime. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there anything else from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project > > > > > > > > > > that can be added to it? Also do the above mentioned > > > JIRAs > > > > > useful > > > > > > as > > > > > > > > > part > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > FAQ, or mention in Release Notes will > > > > > > > > > > be sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see now. Yes, release notes are definitely the place > > > for > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sdo-java-faq.htmlpage > > > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > > > not have menu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Good point > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-project-code-structure.htmlno > > > > > > > > > > menu , old structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are right, we need to add a section for the lib > > > project and > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > tools-test project > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5) http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-source.htmlno > > > > menu > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > old > > > > > > > > > > structure > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > again, yes, this doesn't reflect the move of the api > > > project > > > > into > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > main > > > > > > > > > sdo trunk > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6) developer guide - should we refer to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-development-guide.htmland > > > > > > > > > > make SDO Dev Guide more complete? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think ideally we would incorporate some of the new > > > content > > > > from > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > sca > > > > > > > > > guide into an sdo guide. If the SCA guide is built up by > > > wiki > > > > > > include > > > > > > > > > directives, there may be scope for including generic > > > chunks into > > > > > out > > > > > > > own > > > > > > > > > guide. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 7) > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.htmlagain > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > > > > can refer to > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sca-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8) TUSCANY-1026 > > > > > > > > > > Also, why > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/distribution/src/main/release/bin/samples/sampleProgramContents.html > > > > > > > > > > opens the html page without browser rendering it as > > > html? > > > > (like > > > > > > > shows > > > > > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > html tags etc.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a firefox issue. It's fine in IE. Not > > > sure why > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > in firefox though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can we provide this link in > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This looks like a useful rework of some of the content > > > that I > > > > > think > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > already in the site. It certainly was at one time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9) TUSCANY-1531 > > > > > > > > > > From this - comment #1 - Some pages are only available > > > on the > > > > > left > > > > > > > > menu > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > this page : > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/developing-sdo-java.html > > > > > > > > > > It should probably be listed/visible from : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-documentation-menu.htmlas > > > > > > > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > > one of the pages with more contents on it. > > > > > > > > > > looks like is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > great > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And with 7) we can fix comment #2 - User guide has wrong > > > styles > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-user-guide.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fine > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Amita for this useful review. I'll pick some of > > > these > > > > > things > > > > > > > up. > > > > > > > > > Can you let me know which you plan to do and which you > > > would > > > > like > > > > > me > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > do? > > > > > > > > > Anyone else watching this thread is of course more than > > > welcome > > > > to > > > > > > > pitch > > > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > too. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Amita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
