We put a proxy in front of Tomcat. It serves all the static content.
emerson cargnin wrote:
Well, I said at the beginning that I'm not a big fan of this approach, but I understand the reasons behind it and the difficulties it would have to change it. Other reason for using this approach is when you have a great amount of static content, like images. An update of the war would have to include 1 or more giga of images and static html pages. What about if you have different applications (wars) that share common headers, footers, images, etc? Now people usually do it using symlinks, which makes it difficult using windows.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
