Francois Pinard wrote: > [Bram Moolenar] > > >Hmm, in my POV a rule like: > > > target: one two three > > >means that "one", "two" and "three" are build in sequence, not at the > >same time. I suppose adding the "-jN" argument changes the semantics of > >the Makefile, and that causes it to break. > > In fact, so far that I know (and everything I know is debatable! :-), > the "in sequence" is not part of the semantic of Makefiles, and should > never be relied upon. Of course, if you experiment with various "make" > implementations, you may observe that dependencies are usually build in > sequence, but this should be seen as an accident, and not as a proof.
So how do I tell make that I want to build three targets in sequence then? For generice make, not GNU make. -- Birthdays are healthy. The more you have them, the longer you live. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
