Time outside the vortex moves faster than normal in a equalized vacuum were positive and negative vacuum energies are equal.
Should read Time outside the vortex moves faster than normal because the reaction is happening in a zone of positive vacuum energy. In a equalized vacuum were positive and negative vacuum energies are equal, time move at its usual rate. On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Time slows down inside a cavity where negative vacuum energy builds up. As > a counterbalance to the negative vacuum energy inside the cavity, positive > vacuum energy builds up outside the cavity. Therefore, outside the cavity > where the vacuum energy is positive is where time accelerates. > > In a catalyst, a SPP vortex forms where the vacuum energy is reduced. The > chemical reaction does not need to happen inside the vortex. The chemical > reaction happens just outside the vortex where the vacuum energy is > positively amplified. Time outside the vortex moves faster than normal in a > equalized vacuum were positive and negative vacuum energies are equal. > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Roarty, Francis X < > francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: > >> Bob, I think here again is where the Jan Naudt’s paper on relativistic >> hydrogen applies to the hydrinos and Rydberg atoms the same. You asked “? >> How do you ascribe mass density to something only one atomic layer thick? “ >> IMHO the hydrogen atom morphs with changes in ether density provided by >> the nano geometry environment in exactly the same way a hydrogen atom >> ejected from the sun at high fractions of C appears to change from our >> perspective but without the needed velocity, like the near C hydrogen >> ejected from the corona you have relativistic change in mass but it might >> actually be a decrease in mass since containment lowers vacuum density >> below the value for a stationary open space observer. The point being >> gravitational square law changes in vacuum density are trumped by >> London/Casimir forces at nano scale and you can have ratios of vacuum >> density between Casimir cavities and *earth bound paradox twin/observer* >> on the same order as the ratio between *earth bound paradox >> twin/observer *and the near C twin. I believe Lorentzian contraction >> should appear the same from either perspective but the mass change in this >> case would seem to mean the mass of the quantum geometry that is depleting >> the ether density should increase from the perspective of the modified >> hydrogen traveling thru the depleted region. From our oerspective [like the >> near C twin] we see the modified hydrogen as Lorentzian contracted, time >> dilated such that radioactive forms of hydrogen appear to decay faster but >> from local observation actually “put in the normal time” spending thousands >> of years in these Casimir cavities while only a few seconds pass for us >> sitting in the lab outside the reactor. Everytime I go out on this limb I >> get less afraid as I see other pieces of the puzzle slowly embracing the >> temporal aspects of this anomaly. >> >> Fran >> >> >> >> *From:* Bob Higgins [mailto:rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Thursday, November 12, 2015 11:10 AM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]: How many atoms to make condensed matter? >> >> >> >> Jones, your description below about metallic hydrogen stimulates me to >> wonder about atoms, molecules, particles, and condensed matter. Obviously >> a single atom of H is not metallic hydrogen. A single molecule of hydrogen >> is more "dense" than the H/D(1) species of Rydberg matter. I don't think >> anyone would categorize an ordinary H2 molecule as metallic or condensed >> matter. The X(1) species of Rydberg matter is shown to exist in particular >> for H/D and the alkali metals having commonly 7 or more atoms. Are these >> Rydberg clusters better described as large molecules? A small particle of >> metal? Generalized condensed matter? How do you ascribe mass density to >> something only one atomic layer thick? It is interesting to consider. >> >> >> >> The Rydberg matter "snowflakes" called X(1), where X is usually an alkali >> metal, are called Rydberg because the electron orbitals are highly excited >> Rydberg states in high order flattened (nearly planar) orbitals. The >> nuclear separation of H(1) is bigger than that for the H2 molecule. >> Existence for X(1) Rydberg matter particles (clusters, molecules) is well >> reproduced, modeled, measured, and is utilized by many based on the well >> described characteristics of the snowflakes obtained, in a large part, from >> rotational spectroscopy. >> >> >> >> The existence of Holmlid's ultra-dense form is not reproduced, and what >> form it might take is completely speculative. The evidence for it appears >> to be solely from the accelerated species found in supposed Coulomb >> Explosion (CE). Why is this species not be examined by conventional >> rotational spectroscopy, as has been used to verify the existence of the >> X(1) Rydberg matter? I would think that the comprising atoms could NOT be >> in a DDL state, because if they were, they would not be susceptible to >> photonic ionization (DDL states are supposed to have too little angular >> momentum to form a photon), which Holmlid claims causes CE and is his basis >> for the existence of the D(-1) / D(0) state of matter in the first place. >> Since the D(-1)=D(0) matter is supposedly susceptible to photo-ionization >> and CE, it seems like it should also be detectable in a rotational spectrum. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> Fran - The only way Holmlid’s claims make sense is that the dense >> hydrogen he describes is a more stable phase of hydrogen than metallic >> hydrogen. This means it is a phase or isomer which does not require extreme >> containment. >> >> >> >> For instance, we know that alloys with alkali metals will lower the >> pressure requirements for metallic hydrogen by 400%. In the case of the >> Holmlid phase, which I still call DDL until it is shown to be different, >> the species could be stable without any pressure or with slight containment. >> >> >
