Why can't the peak be at 100eV or 10eV and many order of magnitude more intense. There is not much in the shown signal that indicates a peak in teh extreme spectra near the seen peak in the background. I think it looks like a 1/X^n curve that continues way below the cutof of the instrument. The seen peak in the extreme spectra is way to strange to be a normal peak, clearly an artefact of the filtering of the instrument. So, if this is not an artefact, what we are seeing can very well be something that is rare and the bulk of the show is perhaps a result of much lower energetic electrons if we assume that the brehmstrahlung is from a distribution of electrons with different speeds. This does however indicate unexplained high energy releases and is a clear signal of nuclear origin as stated.
So, we don't have an indication of a radon peak that's just the cut off effect. The energy can be many orders of magnitude higher and can very well reach significant levels, we don't now. There is indication of nuclear origin - Assuming no artefact and that this can be reproduced. I'm not an expert in radon anomalies and anomalies in the spectra in general, just that I would have expected the radon peak to be there much more clearly in order to buy that explanation. Regards Stefan On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:20 PM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > How about the Maxwell-boltzmann distribution? > http://ibchem.com/IB/ibnotes/full/sta_htm/Maxwell_Boltzmann.htm > > Lower temperatures have higher peaks which is the opposite of a > blackbody distribution. > > Harry > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > One of the researchers that I discussed this with suggested that the > > spectrum looked like a blackbody radiation. I did some analysis and can > > tell you that it does NOT look like blackbody radiation. Blackbody > > radiation cuts off very sharply on the high energy side. At 100 million > > degrees, there would be some energy at 100keV, but by the time it got to > > 1MeV, the blackbody radiation would have declined by 40 orders of > magnitude. > > That is not what is seen here. > > > > It is really hard to explain a continuous spectrum that looks like it > > probably spans at least 2 orders of magnitude in photon energy with > maximum > > energies over 1MeV. The best explanations so far (and there has not > been a > > chance for widespread vetting) are that it is due to: 1) Bremsstrahlung > > from really high energy light charged particles [electrons, positrons] > with > > a distribution of energy, or 2) interference in the NaI detector by a > flux > > of neutral particles causing the apparent spectrum by activation of the > Na, > > I, and Th in the detector crystal. > > > > Thank you for the links. I will have a look these papers. > > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> The peak is at least 10x more than that of you provided... > >> > >> Bob Higgins, in my work with Akito, I proposed that in cold fusion you > >> have, unlike the conventional fusion, the fusion of more than 2 nuclei. > >> There are not experiments with more than 2 nuclei fusioning (C12 is > formed > >> by B8, which is stable for 10^-15s, I am talking here of something less > than > >> 10^-23s in coincidence). This will form an excited ball that will shine > at a > >> few kev. There will surely be brehmstralung, from this weak gama rays. > >> > >> http://vixra.org/abs/1209.0057 > >> > >> http://vixra.org/abs/1401.0202 > > > > > >
