The surface plasmon polariton (SPP) is first born out of concentrated infrared photons, but it gets to a stage where it can extract nuclear binding energy out of the nucleus. That energy is stored and downshifted through FANO resonance in a soliton until the SPP decays whereupon its EMF energy content now in the XUV and X-ray range is released to the far field.
I have been saying for years now that a cold reactor will cause gamma radiation. IMHO, this is due to the failure to form a Bose condensate among many Surface Plasmon Polaritons (SPP)s. Lack of sufficient polariton pumping allows the SPP to initiate the LENR reaction, but not enough thermal pumping to create a bose condensate among the SPPs to spread the radiation around to thermalize or downshift gamma level radiation through super-absorption among many SPPs. Low temperature means many SPP are working alone thereby creating x-rays because no downshifting is possible. High temperatures means many SPPs working together in a BEC to share energy throughout the SPP ensemble through super-absorption. SPP pumping is similar to laser pumping https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_pumping Until the SPP pumping gets to an inversion condition, a SPP bose condensate cannot be formed. Weak pumping means no laser beam is produced. Usually, the x-xay stage lasts only a few seconds during startup on shutdown when the reactor is cold or is getting cold. On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com> wrote: > You make some good points about MFMP. > > I’m not an immediate member of MFMP. I’m volunteering my time/resources > when/where I can. If MFMP had more resources, they could certainly do a > better job. Do they deserve the resources? I think so. I have nothing > but mutual respect for them and what they’re doing. I am sure Bob G has > his reasons for making certain statements and I cannot answer for him. > > All I know is... We have a strange radiation signal and it needs to be > investigated further. First it needs to be reproduced, then it needs to be > understood. Once that happens, it may be possible to produce/increase > excess heat. We either came across a mistake/error or have possibly > unearthed a signal that others have found in the past. This is what > Research/Science is all about, isn’t it? > > Maybe someone out there will now try to replicate this, too. I understand > the disappointment of many about what was done with the announcements > here. All I can say is, “Hang in there.” We are ... We’re not finished > with this yet and there’s more to come. > > - Mark Jurich > > *From:* Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:58 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Big surprise or big dud ? > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > The Geiger Counter was essentially brain dead during this part of the run >> and also with a post Ba calibration on the low end... The detected >> radiation wasn’t shown to be sourced from the active cell. > > > I am a big fan of the MFMP. But there are many questions that still need > to be sorted out. I would suggest that this was an interesting run that > highlighted some things that can be focused on and whose measurements > should be tightened up for future runs. > > Here are some statements I'm seeing in Mats Lewan's recent blog post [1]: > > > "The character of the x-ray signal is, according to MFMP, the best way to > detect that the replication is successful. The energy of the x-ray photons > are between *0 and 300 keV* (medical radiography typically uses x-rays > between 5 and 150 keV), and there’s a brief but massive burst of x-rays > when the reaction starts." (Mats.) > > "We have said that *only two paths would satisfy us*: Statistically > significant Isotopic or elemental shifts from Fuel to Ash ... Statistically > significant emissions *commensurate, correlating, or anti correlating to > excess heat* ... We are happy to tell you that *we believe we have > satisfied our condition 2*" (Bob Greenyer's letter.) > > "To our extreme surprise, the onset of excess heat followed the massive > anomaly in emissions and the minor anomalies *were during and only during > excess heat.*" (Bob Greenyer.) > > > I worry that MFMP were premature in making this announcement. The people > on LENR Forum are not going to be nice. > > Eric > > > [1] > https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/02/24/breaking-the-e-cat-has-been-replicated-hers-the-recipe/ > >
