On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mark Jurich <jur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
The Geiger Counter was essentially brain dead during this part of the run > and also with a post Ba calibration on the low end... The detected > radiation wasn’t shown to be sourced from the active cell. I am a big fan of the MFMP. But there are many questions that still need to be sorted out. I would suggest that this was an interesting run that highlighted some things that can be focused on and whose measurements should be tightened up for future runs. Here are some statements I'm seeing in Mats Lewan's recent blog post [1]: "The character of the x-ray signal is, according to MFMP, the best way to detect that the replication is successful. The energy of the x-ray photons are between *0 and 300 keV* (medical radiography typically uses x-rays between 5 and 150 keV), and there’s a brief but massive burst of x-rays when the reaction starts." (Mats.) "We have said that *only two paths would satisfy us*: Statistically significant Isotopic or elemental shifts from Fuel to Ash ... Statistically significant emissions *commensurate, correlating, or anti correlating to excess heat* ... We are happy to tell you that *we believe we have satisfied our condition 2*" (Bob Greenyer's letter.) "To our extreme surprise, the onset of excess heat followed the massive anomaly in emissions and the minor anomalies *were during and only during excess heat.*" (Bob Greenyer.) I worry that MFMP were premature in making this announcement. The people on LENR Forum are not going to be nice. Eric [1] https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/02/24/breaking-the-e-cat-has-been-replicated-hers-the-recipe/
