a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
> If there had been some way of determining how full the pipe was, besides > stains, Murray would have mentioned it. > There are other ways, and he did mention them. But not to you. Not yet. Again, you suffer from the illusion that fact X which you personally have not seen cannot exist. Has it occurred to you that you may not have heard the whole story? - Jed
