On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:31 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote:
More idle speculation. Wait until Penon's report surfaces and let's see > what he really said. > Hardly idle speculation! Just pointing out the obvious. It does not appear to be obvious to you. Once the report comes out, I suppose it will be one of those three cases I just identified. Presumably the flow meter goes on reading the running total and the average > flow rate mentioned is simply the total divided by the number of days - > less 10% that Rossi persuaded Penon to reduce the number by in order to be > conservative. > Which would be totally ridiculous if it were being read off by hand, and not collected with a data acquisition system. It's also pretty silly that there was a 10 percent discount. What would be needed would be the accurate raw data. Eric
