If IH had real concerns it is inconceivable to me they didn't do
something about it until after the test was completed.
You have never provided proof the flow was less than Rossi stated. Still
no piping diagram, still no ERV report.
The contract called for ~ 1MW with a COP>6 for 340(?) days What it was
on any particular day is another story.
I see that IH are now claiming being manager of Investments for Cherokee
means Vaughn was not a legal manager.
On 8/13/2016 11:14 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
So it was Murray who raised the alarm at the last minute . . .
Alarms were raised throughout the test, and made known to many people,
including me. Your assertion that this happened only at the end is
factually incorrect. I expect you will go on repeating it, but it is
wrong.
The report of a constant water flow rate maybe explained by the
flow meter giving a running total and the constant flow that Jed
makes much of, was simply the average flow calculated by dividing
the total by the number of days.
First, I make "much of it" because the actual flow was something like
3 to 10 times lower than this, as shown by the rust and by various tests.
Second, if the flow varied significantly, then an "average flow" would
be worse than useless for calorimetry. You compute the heat by
multiplying the flow rate by the heat of the water or steam. Since the
temperature varied, you would be multiplying the wrong flow rate, and
the results would be meaningless.
- Jed
