Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> wrote: you can now prove that you have good sources of information; > can you please explain Item 49 from the Miami Court pacermaker > explaining us what has Cherokee et al withdrawn and especially WHY? >
I know nothing about laws or lawsuits, and I have not read this document. You should ask a lawyer. Perhaps Jones Beene can enlighten us. > Is this an "elastic" withdrawal? > If it is "without prejudice" that means it can be re-introduced. See: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/without+prejudice - Jed
