Well then, your whole line of argument involving half filled pipes, ventilation holes, fans, people dying from heat exhaustion really is a waste of time for yourself and everybody else. You are wasting megatones of internet ink for no proper effect.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > An power output of 3 KW would still meet the licence requirements. >> > > The input was ~20 kW. Do you mean a power output of 23 kW would satisfy > the requirements? > > I am sure that if I.H. had measured 23 kW with confidence, and Rossi had > transferred the IP, they would have paid the $89 million. They said they > were not that concerned about the letter of the contract. They just wanted > to see proof of excess heat. Unfortunately, a careful measurement of the > heat balance showed there was no excess heat. Not even 3 kW. > > 23 kW of output with 20 kW input would not measurably change the room > temperature, but you could measure it with proper calorimetry. > > - Jed > >
