Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered. It is worthwhile to verify that that patent is valid.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:05 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Axil, > Going into the experiment with the idea of proving doesn't work reminds me > of MIT and Pons & Fleischmann. > What happens if the experiment did work? Then IH would have given away > Rossi's IP for nothing and stripped Rossi of what little protection he does > have. > AA > > > On 2/18/2017 5:55 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > Brian Ahern would want to verify that Rossi's IP is a fraud as a > statement of verified fact. IH et al wound want to verify their > assertion that Rossi's IP does not work. If IH is telling truth that IP is > nothing, then they lose nothing related to that IP and advance their case > against Rossi. > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 4:35 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> > wrote: > >> Axil, >> I don't think it follows that IH is free to do what they want with >> Rossi's IP. If that were the case why would they have agreed to give Rossi >> $89 million? Surely his technology, if it works, is worth more than $11 >> million. >> >> I also thought Brian Ahern had expressed his opinion that Rossi never had >> anything and was just a fraud. Correct me if I'm wrong. If so, why would >> Brian want to work on it? >> >> As for facts - I have stated many times that they are not all known and >> we should wait for full information. It does not seem to be a popular view. >> AA >> >> >> >> On 2/18/2017 4:20 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >> >> There are dozens of well motivated open source replicators of Ross's >> tech working now including brian Ahern and an additional hundreds that will >> enter the field as soon as Rossi's tech is made available. I am disgusted >> with all the innuendo that is involved in the Rossi tech issue. It will be >> refreshing to deal with FACTS that can be verified or disproved by >> research. IH paid for that IP and it is theirs to do with it as they see >> fit. The licence agreement no longer is binding. LET US HAVE THE FACTS AND >> NOTHING BUT THE FACTS. >> >> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:44 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Axil, >>> Apart from some of that information being proprietary it doesn't help to >>> have this run by avowed enemies. Remember how MIT and CalTec bodged the >>> replication of Pons & Fleischmann? >>> >>> AA >>> >>> >>> On 2/18/2017 2:53 PM, Axil Axil wrote: >>> >>> IH would be well served to release all the Rossi provided INFO involving >>> the Rossi reaction to the open source community and Brian Ahern as its >>> most prominent member to allow that community to run tests to see if >>> Rossi's technology is a fraud. This verification would support IH in their >>> claims about Rossi. >>> >>> Sunshine is the best disinfectant. >>> >>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Brian Ahern <ahern_br...@msn.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I was watching a program about O.J. Simpson and how he had a loyal >>>> following. I see parallels to Rossi's loyal following. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Feed a cold and starve a fever; >>>> >>>> argue with no true believer." >>>> >>>> It is a waste of effort to expect the citizens of Planet Rossi to >>>> abandon their hero. He is too charismatic and has hypnotized a group by >>>> appealing to their hopes and dreams of clean energy. >>>> >>>> It is futile to expect logic and evidence will be able to de-program >>>> the earnest followers. >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From:* a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 8:11 PM >>>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:How to overestimate water flux by wrongly >>>> positioning an instrument >>>> >>>> That is certainly one way of avoiding answering the questions I asked. >>>> You say you have "all the data." It seems very unlikely that IH has >>>> all Rossi's data and so how would you get it? >>>> >>>> AA >>>> >>>> On 2/17/2017 6:18 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >>>> >>>> a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have every reason to doubt it. Saying that you have the piping >>>>> drawing but refuse to publish it doesn't hold water. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Okay, so you are saying I am a liar. Got it. I will block any further >>>> messages from you. >>>> >>>> Done and done. >>>> >>>> - Jed >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
