Latest additions under "indistinct boxes / orbs / others" include this gem, uploaded just now:
watch?v=QJkMBZq41Yo ..so, these are unambiguously your standard flying orbs; definitely not drones, yet under intelligent control, and certainly not floating passively like Chinese lanterns. They periodically disappear then reappear, just as the cubes do when seen in broad daylight. Like the other video caught at dusk / dawn, the low light here places the objects right in their cube / orb transition zone, if my association of these UAP is correct. So, let's take a closer look at what happens when they disappear and reappear, OK? In this first shot, we see five objects; to my eyes at least, they have an approximate 'square' outline, but most folks are just going to identify these as amorphous 'glowing orbs': https://i.ibb.co/yy5JRzM/frame1.png In the very next frame, the four orange orbs have dimmed substantially; the greener one to the right remaining bright. The square outline of the dimmed orbs is now clearer: https://i.ibb.co/60T3J4y/frame2.png In the subsequent frame, the fading orbs disappear completely: https://i.ibb.co/YyZBg08/frame3.png ..momentarily the green orb remains alone, for six more frames, until the others begin to fade back in again: https://i.ibb.co/VqbfySm/frame4.png Here, the square outlines are clearer still. The 'glowing orb' UAP *is* the 'cube' UAP, folks.. *this is no longer a hunch.!* Are they boxes, or orbs? *Yes*! Yes, they are. Apart from when they're invisible. (or 'sky-coloured', anyway.. active camo maybe?) Cubes by day, orbs by night, but same-same, and birds of a feather.. Anyone still think i'm seeing things? Just 9 hrs ago, another video was posted, this time showing how these things are arriving here: watch?v=ozVk-I-WThg So, continuing the basic premise that if we could watch that in daylight, we'd see block-shaped drones dropping out of - god knows what, a saucer? - whatever the upper red orb was actually concealing.. just last week, a video was uploaded that on first impressions i would assume had been composited, owing simply to being 'too good to be true', however look at what it shows: watch?v=UM8BfiLSgAc&t=99s ..in broad daylight, this video's showing us precisely what the already-confirmed hypothesis predicts - white, square / rectangular child objects released by a saucer, all of which exhibit non-Newtonian motion.. so if this last one is a hoax, it seems remarkably prescient regardless.. I'm not resting a case on any one piece of evidence, but the plurality and consistency of examples here - sufficient for making testable (verifiable!) hypotheses - seems overwhelming.. it's basically categorical, no? Might not be an 'attack', but by any reasonable definition, Earth is currently under alien invasion; they're being seen everywhere, on a daily basis. Lue Elizondo notes that they're increasing in frequency and number. Although i've only been at this a few weeks, it seems hard to disagree. In recent weeks i've seriously considered Elizondo's suggestions of, perhaps, a 'shadow biosphere' that was somehow also native to Earth, or at least Sol, if perhaps with an inter-dimensional aspect.. however i don't think he was espousing the idea so much as including it by way of example of 'all things on the table'. Isn't it just much more plausible however that these box-orbs are being deposited by larger craft, as the last two vids there imply? Pretty classic 'invasion-y' type behaviour, no? Maybe the payloads are just recon drones, for now.. maybe these are mostly what we're seeing.. As already alluded to in the list, box-orbs seem to be associated with saucers.. it's the same tech-base, not different / other aliens.. the same ones are responsible for saucers, cubes, and orbs.. (and probably ghost rockets and tic tacs too, IMHO) It's not some cosmopolitan mix of local techno-cultures.. but one, particular guest, that we have. And right now, they seem very interested in us indeed.. (woo-wavy hands) On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:44 PM Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Chinese fire lanterns. Which explains why they are seen all around the > > world. It wouldn'tš surprise me if you even have a small Chinese > community > > in W3. > > Always appreciate your thoughts, but these things defy such easy dismissal. > > I've specifically avoided listing most orange-orb sightings for just this > reason; sure, some may be consistent with Chinese lanterns or flares, but > neither can repeatedly switch on and off, or demonstrate the controlled > independent flight seen in some of those examples. > > In spite of this, as i say, i suspect some, if not most orange / red orbs > that aren't easily written off are in fact these same craft - box-orbs - > albeit seen to glow by night. > > And quite independently, the orange-orb vids are at least as common as > box-orbs in their own right. You could easily string together a list of > perhaps 20 or more videos showing orange orbs moving in concert, winking > out one by one then reappearing, moving against the wind or holding > perfectly stationary despite it. A few such examples also demonstrate > extreme accelerations too. I haven't seen anyone else suggest they may be > the same craft as the box-orbs, but either way one could argue that orange > lights by night are more eye-catching, and visible over greater distances, > than any of these box-orbs examples which by day show only glassy, > iridescent-metallic cubes, which, already faint to the eye, periodically > disappear then reappear. UAP that 'might' seem consistent with Chinese > lanterns or flares are a dime a dozen (major sightings in the US this > week), but i'm specifically NOT listing them, in order to avoid that > ambiguity. This is why multiple independent vids of these cubes by > daylight are so compelling - 'Chinese lanterns' seems the LEAST consistent > potential explanation. > > By 'iridescent' i mean that they display flecks of green / purple and > other flashes of colour, but without appearing to 'glow' or radiate much > light themselves. The appearance may be of a semi-transparent > titanium-like texture, or if further away, something like a flying fish > tank or fridge. > > But pictures are worth a thousand words, so if you haven't checked out the > list already (worth it i promise!), i'll copy here a quick list of > 'box-orb' highlights,, > > Here's some single ones seen by day (head over to YT and complete the > URL's): > > watch?v=TiowRwpwVAQ&t=6s > watch?v=z3FL98gBF&t=15s > watch?v=8UNK0rhKxsE > watch?v=Pfhm4fyRBZk&t=12s > watch?v=Y7Rv92Mfwvo > watch?v=z3FL98gBF-s&t=14 > watch?v=G9kURVaty4w > watch?v=fIRrPXjzbrM > watch?v=e5obs5slhxU > watch?v=cdcevb5aFv8 > > Etc. etc. - note the last one above is either seen at dawn or dusk, so if > i'm right, is either about to become a glowing orb, or else has just > resumed a cubic appearance.. > > Please use a big screen (not a phone) for these, as they're only the size > of a car and usually at least a few hundred meters away from the > phone-camera (ie. so none feature optical zoom). > > Are those anything like Chinese lanterns you've ever seen? > > That's the great thing about day-time captures; these aren't just > indistinct orbs of light, but have a clear 'square' aspect or 'cubic' > profile. In the close-up examples, you can see this iridescence i mention > - a key feature, and quite unlike anything else. A highly-polished > fish-tank, perhaps, but beyond that..? > > > Seen in clusters, they look like this: > > watch?v=Rw1oSHed1Mk > watch?v=BsukTV7aGPM > watch?v=wv9m9qxkhDM > watch?v=kn9EdEsSWJ8&t=7 > watch?v=1_1FcVD6KmI (incredible display of non-Newtonian controlled flight > here!) > watch?v=JHQp9YGFUkM&t=128s > watch?v=wPIvgOgXv7U&t=217s (check out this whole video, it includes other > examples) > > Etc. etc. - they're ubiquitous and multitudinous. They also tumble / > rotate on all three axes (or should i say at least three axes), transiently > disappear then reappear, and may be the same entities behind many if not > most 'orb' sightings (ex: watch?v=bouEV1fBxlk ), perhaps 'ghost rockets' > too; flying orbs with all-sparkly trails, like these: > > watch?v=GL_W8x81amU > watch?v=UeIK6iZTzOo > watch?v=oVs1q1_8JXs > watch?v=xGug7Y7faM0&t=309s > > ..you get the drift. Do check out the list if you'd like to see more > examples of any of these. Note that when seen in groups, they seem to > alternate between 'paler' and 'darker' shades of what could be grey-white, > or else semi-translucent, basically sky-colours.. Groups of up to a > hundred UAP's have been swarming US Navy groups; suffice to say, these > things must be top suspects. > > But do any of these groups of flying fridges look anything like > Chinese-bloody-lanterns to you mate? :P > > YouTube user Engine TwentySeven's vids are particularly special as they > show clear manoeuvering over great distances and velocities (but without a > big screen you'll be staring blankly at blue sky, wondering what all the > fuss is about). > > So now re-check those 'tethered' examples: > > watch?v=ZubVcEHtBlw > https://www.tiktok.com/@draw_my_town/video/7104013293471304965?lang=en > > Still think they're just Chinese Lanterns? Note how the tether itself > also displays flashes of iridescence - as if composed of the same > material..!? > > This is aliens sir, i'm sure of it (get yer specs on!) > > Finally, as to where these are captured: while the tik tok one's from > London i haven't tried to establish where exactly. > > The one that appeared over my workplace a few days ago was this one: > > watch?v=oGs6JgFzD0M > > https://i.ibb.co/KL8khXd/Look.png > > ..note the other peds also filming it? The location is southbound on > Bolsover street, at the junction with Clipstone street, Tuesday, about 4 pm > judging by the shadow angles (sun's in the west, to the right here). > Slap-bang in the middle of the west end (Fitzrovia W1), an afternoon > summers day in broad daylight. I work on Foley St, a few hundred meters > SSE of here. Been craning my neck all week, every time i'm outside for a > fag break or lunch.. fat chance of seeing one, right? Yet i might've only > missed it by minutes! Argh! > > I honestly HAVEN'T seen one over W3, yet.. although last week i DID see > one over Gunnersbury park - on the W5 side, near Lionel Rd to be exact; > this thing was enormous, at plane height but inside the atmosphere. It > either shone or reflected bright warm light from a forward bulbous section, > the light growing in intensity, and behind that i could make out a box-like > section which protruded from one side, but it definitely had no wings, > looked nothing like a plane, and was completely stationary for the few > minutes before it vanished without trace (while i was fumbling for my > crappy 2G phone with its low-res potato-cam).. IOW for this i have no > evidence whatsoever, and wouldn't mention it but for the fact that you've > at least known me long enough to know i don't expect anyone to accept > anecdotes for evidence.. But that one certainly would've been visible > from W3, had i been there instead, and also from your old grammar school, > had you been there.. > > I don't know if that craft has anything to do with these much-smaller > box-orbs, but the evidence above for these things' existence seems pretty > iron-clad to me; any single video can be a fake or mistake etc., but when > you have dozens of videos and witness testimonies all showing and > describing the same thing, Occam's argument against redundant > multiplication of entities would suggest we're looking at a > highly-consistent - if enigmatic - real phenomenon. > > Look at the totality of just the video evidence i'm offering - could all > of these be explained by, say, square-aperture bokeh, perhaps? But in that > case - if the 'square' aspect is some form of image distortion - then > regardless of their real shape, what the hell are these things flying > around in broad daylight? Something's obviously there - credible reports > of radar returns and IR emissions, quite aside from whether they also > appear as glowing orbs by night - we're seeing *something* here, and it > *looks* consistently 'cubic' or 'square', and also orb-like. > > I don't know who, what or why they're here, or what they're doing, or why > they sometimes appear as tethered pairs, or alone or in groups. No idea if > they glow as orbs by night or not, or if they do, why. I have suspicions > that if they *are* also the glowing orbs by night, then they're probably > also the 'ghost rockets', too - their trails perhaps condensation or > crystalisation of air components such as water - but basically 'contrails', > if produced by unusual means, as opposed to say some kind of ejecta from > the craft themselves. > > What seems certain is that there's box-like craft, with an iridescent, > glassy-metallic appearance by day, flying freely in all skies, everywhere.. > there's other consistent types of UFO and locales etc., but this is a > consistent thing unto itself, and seemingly more common that all > 'traditional' UFO types (saucers, cigars etc.) combined. They're all but > ubiquitous, yet until a few weeks ago i'd never heard of them.. > > As far as anyone else reporting on them; each are presented, and commented > on, as individual examples.. no one else seems to be linking all these > examples together and saying '*look, it's the same thing!*'. > > If it was saucers, cigars or tic-tacs etc. i wouldn't be bothering Vorts > with 'known unknowns'. > > But here's an *unknown* unknown.. and ain't it a beaut? Having > identified it as 'a thing' - ie. as some kind of unitary phenomenon - i'm > now learning more things about it - this tethering feature the latest > discovery - and it seems genuinely exciting stuff, worthy of serious > consideration.. beyond-SM physics, in-your-face aliens, IMHO; obviously > technological, and obviously not us. Obviously far ahead of us, if not > ancient. > > Obvioushly *not* drones, meteorological anomalies or > Chinese-bleedin'-lanterns.. (or swamp gas, Mars, Venus *or* Saturn, mass > hysteria or hoax etc. etc.) > > If i haven't made a hard-hitting case for these things here, with this > weight of corroborating video.. then i'm done - that's all i've got.. for > my part though, i'm reeling from the revelation.. it looks unequivocal to > me. > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2022 at 8:24 AM Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Chinese fire lanterns. Which explains why they are seen all around the >> world. It wouldn'tš surprise me if you even have a small Chinese community >> in W3. >> >> On Sat, 2 Jul 2022 at 01:59, Vibrator ! <mrvibrat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> If you check the 'box-orbs' list, i now have at least two that clearly >>> show tethered pairs: >>> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZubVcEHtBlw >>> >>> https://www.tiktok.com/@draw_my_town/video/7104013293471304965?lang=en >>> >>> Same flight config too.. as if the lower one were perhaps siphoning some >>> fluid from the upper one..? JK, no idea what these things are, what >>> they're doing, or why. >>> >>> Bloody exciting time to be alive tho eh? To be able to cross-reference >>> UAP corroborations from independent encounters the world over, updating on >>> a daily basis like this.. All i'm doing is LOOKING at available evidence. >>> And categorising what i see. Little else. Ain't spent a dime on it, yet >>> within weeks i've achieved a level of certainty NASA and SETI could only >>> dream of: this is definitely real, technological, and not us.. >>> >>> Just like that, the greatest mysteries answered.. i'm reeling, dazed, >>> in a slight state of shock here.. awake to a new reality.. >>> >>> What it means, and what to make of it, pffft.. where to start? Best >>> not think about it and carry on? The further questions though - not least >>> the potential for communication - is too alluring.. seeing these things >>> is literally paradigm-shifting.. >>> >>
