The tech from the link below interests me. I'd like to see something like
that tied to vehicle tax fees for pay as you drive efficiency. Eventually
this could evolve into an aviation-style control system like a TCA for
heavily used corridors during peak use for a more fair distribution of taxes
and fees, an incentive to reduce congestion, reduce accidents, and perhaps
the ability to fine tune traffic flow on the fly. I don't particularly care
for the little fiberglass bubble cars, but the "Minority Report" freeway is
an eventual must-have. An e-highway system might be able to pay for itself
along the way, whereas these muni train fiascos are unaffordable, and
inappropriate on many levels. They're ramming one down our throats here
(Oahu) with a 6++ billion price tag, and we can't even pay to keep our kids
in school now even though wealready pay some of the highest taxes in the
country. 

 

http://insurancetech.com/business-intelligence/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2
22002974

 

R.

 

 

From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 7:00 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Traffic accident deaths in Japan hit 57-year low

 

Okay, I found the graph. The article is in Japanese but the graph has
Western dates, from 1950 to 2009 (as opposed to the Japanese date system):

http://mainichi.jp/select/jiken/news/20100103k0000m040014000c.html 

There was a slight increase in the late 1980s. The decline after 1992 is
attributed to increased severity and enforcement of the drunken driving laws
and reckless driving laws, which seems likely to me.

The total number of accidents was 736,160 (29,987 fewer than 2008), with
908,874 people injured. Drunken driving caused 264 fatalities, compared the
peak of 1,161 in 2000. (They only began recording this category separately
around 1992.)

In 1970 they launched the "first war against traffic accidents" mainly with
improvements to roads and traffic signals (it says here) but also with seat
belt laws. The "second war" to reduce accidents began in 1988.

Other news articles on this subject say that roughly half of the fatalities
in 2009 were attributed to elderly drivers.

The minimum age for a driver's license in Japan is 18, and most people do
not drive before age 20, so accidents by young drivers and teenagers are
rarer than in the U.S. Driver education courses and the test you have to
pass to get a license are much more strict, and expensive, than in the U.S.
The fatality rate is lower per capita than the U.S. I expect because people
drive less, and speeds are lower. Pedestrian fatalities used to be higher
per capita than the U.S., because urban roads are crowded and many do not
have sidewalks.

- Jed

Reply via email to