It may be a wrong path to think that the system as including the water flow piping. He may just use larger water flow piping and then have several ecats (just the reactor part) in a common flow of water.
Dennis From: Jed Rothwell Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:16 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:How small Rossi devices might be ganged together <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: >> Yup. But I started writing that text before I learned that. Besides a 10 x >> 10 array is easy to envision, whereas . . . 17 x 17? I think that if you put two devices in series you already get superheated steam, so more than that is likely overkill. In short I would expect the array to be more like 150 x 2, or perhaps 100 X 3, but I certainly wouldn't expect it to be a square array. I would not put them in series. You don't want steam or superheated water flowing by the last on in line. I would put several pipes in parallel through the engine block with water going through all of them. This is how steam locomotive and marine engine boilers worked, either with fire tubes or water tubes. With a 10 x 10 array, the water would flow past at most 10 cells. I do not think you would want it to flow past 100 cells. - Jed
