You are picking up on small things. Just exchange "wavelength" to "energy" in the quoted part and all is right, I was only talking about photon energy, anyway.
2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com> > What are you talking about? You said that gamma rays had longest > wavelength then visibile light (“The gamma ray can have a small wavelength > such that it could almost fit in the range of visible light”, quoted). > That’s absurd. > Yeah, you can say that a 75keV is gamma as you can say that a 2Mhz > Radiofrequncy is HIGH FREQUENCY, but truely it’s near the “medium-to-high” > frequency limit (actually is medium frequency). > If you say that a common visible light source it’s a gamma ray source, you > are crazy. > > *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:17 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does > seem to be a permit. > > I just provided you with examples which are not the case. For example, the > isomer 180m1 > Ta is very stable, but when it decays, it emits at an energy of 75KeV, > which is within the range of x-rays, that is, below 120KeV. > > 2011/10/29 Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com> > >> >The gamma ray can have a small wavelength such that it could almost >> fit in the range of visible light >> >> I think you need to read some physics books. Gamma rays have smaller >> wavelength then X-Rays and visible light. And a re more powerful and >> hazards. >> >> *From:* Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> >> *Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:00 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does >> seem to be a permit. >> >> Gamma rays may have a subjective definition.You can say that Gamma Rays >> are photons emitted by state transitions of the nucleus and X-Rays are >> photons that comes from electrons. X-Ray machines emits what would be >> otherwise consider gamma rays, around 140KeV. For example, >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium-99m >> >> The gamma ray can have a small wavelength such that it could almost fit in >> the range of visible light, such as >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_thorium#Thorium-229m >> >> >> If you consider a gamma ray as photons originated by decays of excited >> decays of the nucleus, you can have wave lengths near the visible spectrum, >> >> >> 2011/10/29 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de> >> >>> Am 29.10.2011 16:32, schrieb Jed Rothwell: >>> >>> Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> How can rossi had a permit if inside the nuclear site there isn’t >>>> even a SINGLE “Nuclear Warning” panel? >>>> >>> >>> I don't know. I have not seen his application or permit. You have a good >>> point. It might be prudent to set up some signs. I am not sure where you >>> would put them, or how far away people should stay. Bianchini set up >>> detectors and found nothing, so they did pay some attention to this issue. >>> >>> Still, as far as anyone knows, cold fusion never generates dangerous >>> radiation. >>> >>> In contradiction to this, Rossi says the heat is made from soft gamma >>> rays. Some 100 kW of gamma rays are dangerous. >>> >>> >>> So it is a little silly to apply the safety standards of fission or >>> plasma fusion to it. This is like saying that hydrogen airships can explode, >>> so we should take extreme precautions when working with helium balloons. >>> >>> No it is like saying a helium Zeppelin is dangerous, because the inventor >>> says, it is filled with hydrogen ;-) >>> >>> - Jed >>> >>> >>> >> > >
