In the Piantelli-Focardi experiments they had either gamma radiation or
thermal energy. They did never observe both together. This is what I
have read in a paper, written by Focardi himself.
They can however not have had some ten watts of gamma radiation, because
they are still alive. ;-)
Also Rossi said, the lead shield was calculated by Focardi. Also he
said, they have a thicker shield in the fat cat and he explained the
weight increase by this.
The truth behind might be this: Focardi /thinks/ there could be
dangerous gamma radiation under circumstances, but they never measured
this and dont know.
If so, then he has lied all time to us.
If not so, then he has lied to the authorities to get the permissions.
Peter
Am 29.10.2011 17:08, schrieb Mattia Rizzi:
>The gamma ray can have a small wavelength such that it could almost
fit in the range of visible light
I think you need to read some physics books. Gamma rays have smaller
wavelength then X-Rays and visible light. And a re more powerful and
hazards.
*From:* Daniel Rocha <mailto:danieldi...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Saturday, October 29, 2011 5:00 PM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com <mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Hey, it didn't blow up! And by the way, there does
seem to be a permit.
Gamma rays may have a subjective definition.You can say that Gamma
Rays are photons emitted by state transitions of the nucleus and
X-Rays are photons that comes from electrons. X-Ray machines emits
what would be otherwise consider gamma rays, around 140KeV. For
example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technetium-99m
The gamma ray can have a small wavelength such that it could almost
fit in the range of visible light, such as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_thorium#Thorium-229m
If you consider a gamma ray as photons originated by decays of excited
decays of the nucleus, you can have wave lengths near the visible
spectrum,
2011/10/29 Peter Heckert <peter.heck...@arcor.de
<mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de>>
Am 29.10.2011 16:32, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Mattia Rizzi <mattia.ri...@gmail.com
<mailto:mattia.ri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
How can rossi had a permit if inside the nuclear site there
isn’t even a SINGLE “Nuclear Warning” panel?
I don't know. I have not seen his application or permit. You have
a good point. It might be prudent to set up some signs. I am not
sure where you would put them, or how far away people should
stay. Bianchiniset up detectors and found nothing, so they did
pay some attention to this issue.
Still, as far as anyone knows, cold fusion never generates
dangerous radiation.
In contradiction to this, Rossi says the heat is made from soft
gamma rays. Some 100 kW of gamma rays are dangerous.
So it is a little silly to apply the safety standards of fission
or plasma fusion to it. This is like saying that hydrogen
airships can explode, so we should take extreme precautions when
working with helium balloons.
No it is like saying a helium Zeppelin is dangerous, because the
inventor says, it is filled with hydrogen ;-)
- Jed
