Oh I am sorry. I forgot that Rossi is such an honest man that he would of course have put the temperature probe inside the "pressure cooker" Duh!
________________________________ From: Andre Blum <andre_vor...@blums.nl> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 11:48 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog +1 On 01/22/2012 07:45 PM, Wolf Fischer wrote: This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do something else besides insulting people and repeating yourself! > >Wolf > > >You are not very bright are you Jed. >> >> >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> >>To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:09 PM >>Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog >> >> >>John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> >>If the water was at 5 to 10 bars, it could easily be heated to 150 - 180 C. >>in the preheating process. At that point, being wrapped up in that massive >>insulation blanket, it would stay over 100 C for hours. >> >> >>There was a TC in the reactor. It measured over 100 deg C, but not 150 to 180 >>deg C. >> >> >>Also, in that scenario, the surface temperature of the reactor would be very >>hot when the internal temperature reached 180 deg C,then it would gradually >>cool down. That is not in evidence. The surface temperature was measured >>several times. It did not vary much. >> >> >>- Jed >> >> >> >> >
