John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: You have repeatedly used Lewan's statement that it *was* very hot to > justify your claims of nuclear reactions. >
Please note: I said the surface temperature did not *vary much*. That means the internal temperature could not have been ~180 deg C later falling to ~100 deg C. The surface temperature would drop by a similar ratio. It did not. > As long as the temperature was measured by someone credible (i.e. NOT > Rossi) and with trustworthy equipment (i.e. NOT supplied by Rossi) then I > would accept that. > As I noted, the temperature was measured by Lewan. I suggest you read these messages more carefully. Over and out. - Jed
