During the September test (with the large steam release in question) the 
temperature exceeded 133C... You can see it in the video.
During the October 6th test, the temperature reaches 123.8C at the onset of 
"self-sustaining mode", and it drops to 103C by the end of the test.
 
http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3284962.ece/BINARY/Test+of+E-cat+October+6+%28pdf%29

From: zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:56:40 -0800



Agreed, wholeheartedly….  There was a thermocouple in the E-Cat and the highest 
I remember it ever getting was ~108degC. Anyone who claims that it was anywhere 
near 150 needs to provide the proof. I don’t think even Yugo would try to float 
that asinine suggestion… or would you Mary? -Mark From: Wolf Fischer 
[mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de] 
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:46 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog 
This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do something else 
besides insulting people and repeating yourself!

Wolf


You are not very bright are you Jed.  From: Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> 
Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog

John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote:  If the water was at 5 to 10 
bars, it could easily be heated to 150 - 180 C. in the preheating process. At 
that point, being wrapped up in that massive insulation blanket, it would stay 
over 100 C for hours. There was a TC in the reactor. It measured over 100 deg 
C, but not 150 to 180 deg C. Also, in that scenario, the surface temperature of 
the reactor would be very hot when the internal temperature reached 180 deg 
C,then it would gradually cool down. That is not in evidence. The surface 
temperature was measured several times. It did not vary much. - Jed             
                           

Reply via email to