Did they stick the probe up the Ecat's bum?
________________________________ From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 11:56 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog Agreed, wholeheartedly…. There was a thermocouple in the E-Cat and the highest I remember it ever getting was ~108degC. Anyone who claims that it was anywhere near 150 needs to provide the proof. I don’t think even Yugo would try to float that asinine suggestion… or would you Mary? -Mark From:Wolf Fischer [mailto:wolffisc...@gmx.de] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 3:46 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog This is were you clearly crossed the line. Get some air and do something else besides insulting people and repeating yourself! Wolf You are not very bright are you Jed. ________________________________ From:Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sunday, 22 January 2012 10:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:University testing of the E-cat question asked on Rossi blog John Milstone <john_sw_orla...@yahoo.com> wrote: If the water was at 5 to 10 bars, it could easily be heated to 150 - 180 C. in the preheating process. At that point, being wrapped up in that massive insulation blanket, it would stay over 100 C for hours. There was a TC in the reactor. It measured over 100 deg C, but not 150 to 180 deg C. Also, in that scenario, the surface temperature of the reactor would be very hot when the internal temperature reached 180 deg C,then it would gradually cool down. That is not in evidence. The surface temperature was measured several times. It did not vary much. - Jed
