the experimenters are writing about essential
things here:
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/follow/follow-2/206-tgoc
The Genius of Celani


Peter

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> That was not directed to you, but to Jed...
>
>
> 2013/2/6 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>
>
>> By all means Dan.  I hope that the calorimeter shows excess power, but I
>> would not be surprised to see otherwise after reviewing the data.
>>
>>  Dave
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
>> To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 2:39 pm
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP Null Result
>>
>>  I guess you did not understand the question or I don't know how to
>> express myself well. Either way, let's wait to see the flow calorimetry.
>>
>>
>>  2013/2/6 Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That was not my question. I want to know if he is also fitting excess
>>>> heat with his curve and thus giving false negatives.
>>>>
>>>
>>>  I am saying I think it is just a slight instrument bias.
>>>
>>>  Anyway, even if it is 0.6 W positive, that is not significant.
>>>
>>>  - Jed
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> Daniel Rocha - RJ
>> danieldi...@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Reply via email to