That is what should be showing up as time progresses. If the calibration values are determined by the faster acting phenomena, then a set of values is obtained that is accurate for fast moving changes. The time domain fit to power steps demonstrates that this is happening and fitting the calculation very closely. Now, if the slow later things come around, then the long term watching of the calculated power would show an increase if excess power is generated or a decrease if some form of endothermic action is happening.
My program fits fast changes on the rising edge and then becomes flat at a value that depends upon the quasi static calibration points. This type of procedure should be powerful in demonstrating LENR activity. Good questions Dan. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> To: John Milstone <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Feb 6, 2013 3:04 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]: MFMP Null Result What if excess heat a slow igniting process with very soft variations? And where higher order correction are important but they are distilled by hours? Say, the effect of excess power follows a slow accumulation of some "potential" with the subsequen slow release of this potential? 2013/2/6 David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> You mention one of the situations that I have a bit of concern about. The curve fit is achieved by using the internal curve fitting routine of Excel in its X-Y chart menu. I am fortunate that it is a quadratic equation that is required and not a higher order. If excess heat were an issue I feel confident that it would impact the calibration accuracy with its non linear behavrior versus temperature becoming evident. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
