That oem page just turns out to be about amps/turns not being as accurate as a full calculation.
No actual coil gauss tests were made despite the writer claiming that they should be. Hence no magic as such, the MOD-A is calculated to be no stronger despite a higher amps/turns, given an identical ID and length then this must mean a drop in the overall current density per square cm of coil cross section. But would result in the OD increasing in the amps turns is higher. This makes sense since it says there are more amps, more amps requires a thicker wire and thicker wires don't pack as well assuming they are round. John On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > If you have seen the famous image of the Rossi HT "HotCat" showing the > resistance wiring, then you probably realize that the electrical input, > even > though it is used for heating, and even though it is not applied constantly > - has an equivalent amp-turn property. > > http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion/viewgallery/29059 > 8 > > It can be estimated that the amp-turn equivalent of the device pictured is > 10,000 if one includes the turns around the wire axis at 10 amps input - > but > that this arrangement cannot be modeled as a solenoid, and the resultant > magnetic field would be complex, probably helical and only a few hundred > gauss. Still, the 10,000 amp-turns stuck in my mind as worth remembering, > since Letts/Cravens found that LENR benefits from modest fields of a few > hundred gauss and not higher. > > As fate would have it, this value turned up recently as a "magic rating" in > another field > > http://www.oem-usa.com/news/info_The_magical_mag_coil.html > > ... magic indeed. The $64 question in all of this is why a small field > works > best - and does a small helical field work best of all? >
