Rossi must be spending a ton of time trying to protect his intellectual property with some sort of auto self-destruct process to prevent reverse engineering.
The best way to stop reverse engineering is to provide a complicated eprom based control system what will auto erase when the reactor is opened. Much can be learned from crypto machine technology in support of reverse engineering prevention. http://www.digikey.com/us/en/techzone/lighting/resources/articles/secure-microcontrollers-keep-data-safe.html On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The hot-cat contains two interrelated systems elements: the mouse and the > cat. > > The mouse is based on the original system’s design that Rossi tried to > interest DGT in. It got into control problems when it got too hot but it > was stable at low output (COP) levels. > > The mouse is driven by a primary resistance heater. And I speculate that > it is most productive at a resonant temperature of which there may be many > levels in the NiH design. > > The H-Cat is driven by the mouse and its resonant temperature is different > than the temperature that the mouse operates at. I suspect that there is a > differing micro-particles diameter sizes in the cat and the mouse to > support differing resonant temperatures. > > The cat and mouse technology is a two stage system that features differing > temperatures to enable controllability. > The mouse is driven at high temperatures but has a marginal COP to provide > control through temperature stability through low COP. To provide good > controllability, the cat has a high gain but the mouse provides a > decoupling between the high temperature primary electrical heating drive > element and high thermal gain of the cat. > > The mouse may also provide hydride based hydrogen production and > reabsorption based on temperature. > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> Hi John, >> >> >> >> Yes it is a mistake to read too much into this amp-turn detail. It is >> more of a curiosity. >> >> >> >> The important thing to try to fit into the big picture, especially as a >> design option for kilowatt level LENR, seems to be that external magnetism >> at a moderate level is beneficial (per Letts/Cravens), and furthermore, >> that a surprising way to achieve a magnetic field is via resistance heating >> wire itself when properly configured (instead of having a dedicated >> electromagnet plus dedicated heating, as two separate inputs). >> >> >> >> AFAIK – no one prior to Rossi has realized this dual use for resistance >> heating. It could be the main reason that the hot cat can achieve the >> remarkable performance claimed. In fact, Rossi himself may not have been >> aiming for a magnetic effect, per se. >> >> >> >> Some months ago, no answer was forthcoming for the question of whether >> the new TIP report concerned the hot version or the original version or >> both. Mats Lewin seems to think it is the hot version. >> >> >> >> The hot version fits more neatly into the SPP theoretical base and >> magnetism fits nicely as well… not to mention conversion of heat to >> electricity. >> >> >> >> *From:* John Berry >> >> >> >> That oem page just turns out to be about amps/turns not being as accurate >> as a full calculation. >> >> >> >> No actual coil gauss tests were made despite the writer claiming that >> they should be. >> >> Hence no magic as such, the MOD-A is calculated to be no stronger despite >> a higher amps/turns, given an identical ID and length then this must mean a >> drop in the overall current density per square cm of coil cross section. >> >> >> >> But would result in the OD increasing in the amps turns is higher. >> >> >> >> This makes sense since it says there are more amps, more amps requires a >> thicker wire and thicker wires don't pack as well assuming they are round. >> >> >> >> John >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:44 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >> >> If you have seen the famous image of the Rossi HT "HotCat" showing the >> resistance wiring, then you probably realize that the electrical input, >> even >> though it is used for heating, and even though it is not applied >> constantly >> - has an equivalent amp-turn property. >> >> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-09/14/cold-fusion/viewgallery/29059 >> 8 >> >> It can be estimated that the amp-turn equivalent of the device pictured is >> 10,000 if one includes the turns around the wire axis at 10 amps input - >> but >> that this arrangement cannot be modeled as a solenoid, and the resultant >> magnetic field would be complex, probably helical and only a few hundred >> gauss. Still, the 10,000 amp-turns stuck in my mind as worth remembering, >> since Letts/Cravens found that LENR benefits from modest fields of a few >> hundred gauss and not higher. >> >> As fate would have it, this value turned up recently as a "magic rating" >> in >> another field >> >> http://www.oem-usa.com/news/info_The_magical_mag_coil.html >> >> ... magic indeed. The $64 question in all of this is why a small field >> works >> best - and does a small helical field work best of all? >> >> >> > >
