http://www.shafted.com.au/photos/albums/funnies/a/thumb_Animal%20Sex%20(Dog%20&%20Racoon).jpg
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Jojo Iznart <jojoiznar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Because the mechanism is different. > > Macro-Evolution stipulates mutations that results in features that confer > a survival advantage. These changes occur from generation to generation. > This is the definition of Natural Selection. > > Micro-Evolution involves changes in features within a single individual > species within its own lifetime. When our skin turns dark after prolonged > exposure to the sun, that is change but that is not Macro-evolution - it's > micro-evolution, it's simply adaptation - changes within a species. The > changes never result in a new species. The changes are rapid which results > in new features. The genetic code is already there in our DNA, no > mutations need to occur to confer that new feature. This is the critical > thing that people must understand to understand the difference between > Macro-Evolution vs. Micro-Evolution. > > Macro-Evolution has never been observable or repeatable. If you know of > any example where we clearly observe a species changing to another species; > please let me know and I'll shut up about Darwinian Evolution forever. > > > Jojo > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson" < > orionwo...@charter.net> > To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 8:28 PM > > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Evolutionists As Idiots > > > Lots of microevolution and adaptation does not result in Macro-evolution >> (change of species/kind). This distinction is important. >> > > How do you know that? And why must you maintain this distinction? Why is > it important for you to keep them separate. I don't. What for? > > Have you measured all those thousands of micro changes over hundreds of > thousands of years and proven the contention that a species can't > eventually transform into a different one? I know I'm not capable because I > can't live that long, but neither can you. > > You seem to be implying that each micro change can never reset the center > of the genetic normality of any species. But that's inaccurate. Every micro > change... every micro-mutation automatically resets the center of genetic > normality of the species for that particular organism. Actually, there is > no way to keep a species from NOT changing over millennium. Each and every > species on the planet is essentially an unstable macro-organism if one is > capable of perceiving this "change" from a geological POV. > > Regards, > Steven Vincent Johnson > svjart.orionworks.com > zazzle.com/orionworks > >
