On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

If you look in the archives, “stripping” was favored by me for many years,
> and I first introduced it here - but opinions change.


The first reference I saw to the OP process was from a thread between you
and Abd Lomax, in 2010, in which you appeared to have introduced the
possibility.  In these posts I give credit to you:

https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg92455.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg92381.html


> If the gain is QM based – which is to say a type of nuclear tunneling
> which is different than electron tunneling in semiconductors, then bosons
> are highly favored to begin with.


Right now I like neutron stripping and the OP process.  In the past, in
approximate chronological order, I've argued for a kind of nano-Polywell;
an ill-conceived dipolariton-based bosonic fusion; Widom-Larsen; p+d fusion
in nickel without thought given to the gammas; hidden d+d fusion and
Pd-attenuated gammas; deuteron and/or proton capture in nickel;
non-equilibrium disruption of the electronic structure of the metal and
attending Coulomb screening; d+d fusion through z-pinch in electric arcs
together with a new kind of electromagnetic channel that short-circuits the
formation of gammas; and now OP and neutron stripping.  As I learn more
about the relevant physics and see insurmountable problems, I'm willing to
switch to a new hypothesis.  (I continue to take seriously some of the more
recent thought experiments even as I give attention to OP + neutron
stripping in the context of nickel.)

In this particular case it's not so much about arguing against something
that is "QM" based, in which spin is central, in favor of neutron
stripping.  I'm addressing an objection you raised earlier on in this
thread:

Note that stripping is closer to brute force thermodynamics, and unlikely
> to happen in condensed matter.


I'm saying that the same objection applies to the bosonic deuteron capture
reaction that you've proposed, because the neutron, as you have clarified,
will only screen at short distances.

Eric

Reply via email to