-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Reed Hedges wrote:
Peter Amstutz wrote:
Yea, it sounds like Lalo has something different in mind, so perhaps the
way to go is to go ahead with two different Python bindings and
eventually have a "bake-off" to decide which is better :-)\
Lalo, ideally your API would be almost the same as the existing bindings
(except extended to be more "Pythonic" where appropriate), do you think?
Not to re-ignite any arguments, but wouldn't that defeat the purpose of
doing bindings by hand, if they end up looking more or less like the SWIG
bindings we already have?
Incidentally, I spent a bit of time with the interface files getting them
back up to speed. They were broken for awhile, but now they work for at
least the first few tutorials. It needs more work, though.
[ Peter Amstutz ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[Lead Programmer][Interreality Project][Virtual Reality for the Internet]
[ VOS: Next Generation Internet Communication][ http://interreality.org ]
[ http://interreality.org/~tetron ][ pgpkey: pgpkeys.mit.edu 18C21DF7 ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD9VnoaeHUyhjCHfcRAqmAAKCMAQdNQI61jp8sv2oYjU3Q1FXsYgCfdBWY
iA6DMNXLjfLHQABBlptQWyc=
=wXOP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
vos-d mailing list
vos-d@interreality.org
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
