I am not sure I understand what you are saying. The lexical data in Wikidata does allow for statements on Lexemes and Forms, as the proposal states explicitly.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:25 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it > does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 8 May 2015 at 06:19, Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I would disagree with requiring the Wiktionary communities to change >> their ways. Instead we should adapt our plans to fit into the way they are >> set up. >> >> Even if the English Wiktionary community would change to have >> per-language pages instead of the current system, it would be rather >> unlikely that all other language editions of Wiktionary would follow in a >> timely manner. I would prefer to leave this decision to the autonomy of the >> projects, and instead adapt to them (which is, by the way, what the >> proposal does). >> >> Yair, as Daniel said, the current Wiktionary pages would not be mapped to >> Q-Items. Since this was unclear, I tried to update the text to make it >> clearer. Let me know if it is still confusing. >> >> I do not think a separate Wikibase instance would be needed to provide >> the data for Wiktionary. I think this can and should be done on Wikidata. >> But as said by Milos and pointed out by Gerard, lexical knowledge does >> indeed require a different data schema. This is why the proposal introduces >> new entity types for lexemes, forms, and senses. The data model is mostly >> based on lexical ontologies that we surveyed, like LEMON and others. >> >> >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Andy Mabbett, 07/05/2015 22:53: >>> >> >The Wiktionary communities tend to strongly disagree that splitting >>> entries >>> >> >per language would be easier for either editors or readers. >>> > How many languages are currently used? How will this scale to ~300 >>> languages? >>> >>> Hm? Last time I counted, the English Wiktionary alone used way more than >>> 300 languages. >>> >>> Nemo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata-l mailing list >>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
