Hoi,
Again I do not care for lexemes and forms when they are distinct from
labels. I hate redundancy.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 8 May 2015 at 06:32, Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not sure I understand what you are saying. The lexical data in
> Wikidata does allow for statements on Lexemes and Forms, as the proposal
> states explicitly.
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:25 PM Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hoi,
>> Given the opposition to having statements on the level of the label, it
>> does not make sense to have Wiktionary included in Wikidata.
>> Thanks,
>> GerardM
>>
>> On 8 May 2015 at 06:19, Denny Vrandečić <vrande...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I would disagree with requiring the Wiktionary communities to change
>>> their ways. Instead we should adapt our plans to fit into the way they are
>>> set up.
>>>
>>> Even if the English Wiktionary community would change to have
>>> per-language pages instead of the current system, it would be rather
>>> unlikely that all other language editions of Wiktionary would follow in a
>>> timely manner. I would prefer to leave this decision to the autonomy of the
>>> projects, and instead adapt to them (which is, by the way, what the
>>> proposal does).
>>>
>>> Yair, as Daniel said, the current Wiktionary pages would not be mapped
>>> to Q-Items. Since this was unclear, I tried to update the text to make it
>>> clearer. Let me know if it is still confusing.
>>>
>>> I do not think a separate Wikibase instance would be needed to provide
>>> the data for Wiktionary. I think this can and should be done on Wikidata.
>>> But as said by Milos and pointed out by Gerard, lexical knowledge does
>>> indeed require a different data schema. This is why the proposal introduces
>>> new entity types for lexemes, forms, and senses. The data model is mostly
>>> based on lexical ontologies that we surveyed, like LEMON and others.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:26 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andy Mabbett, 07/05/2015 22:53:
>>>> >> >The Wiktionary communities tend to strongly disagree that splitting
>>>> entries
>>>> >> >per language would be easier for either editors or readers.
>>>> > How many languages are currently used? How will this scale to ~300
>>>> languages?
>>>>
>>>> Hm? Last time I counted, the English Wiktionary alone used way more than
>>>> 300 languages.
>>>>
>>>> Nemo
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
