> Would it be beneficial to come up with a list of "Standard Hacks" :-)
I think the idea is that you should stay away from hacks as much as possible. One exception is the box model hack for IE5 and IE5.5 - but there are a couple of different ways of doing that one, and which one you pick depends on the particular problem you are having. We generally don't resort to hacks unless not having them would cause serious issues with the design. Even then, if it's possible to alter the design to make it more "standards friendly" without detracting from the look, then we try to do that. I think a lot of people (graphic designers especially) overestimate the amount of attention that clients pay to detail - they generally only look at the site in one browser anyway, so pixel perfection across platforms is not usually necessary. I don't remember the last time a Photoshop mockup looked exactly like the finished site... -- Kay Smoljak Senior Developer/QC Leader/Search Optimisation PerthWeb Pty Ltd - http://www.perthweb.com.au/ Ph: 08 9226 1366 - Fax: 08 9226 1375 ***************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help *****************************************************
