Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > I have yet to see a "good" browser with "solid" CSS support, so
"solid" doesn't mean flawless. I am not that naive ;) > I don't think we can say completely "no to CSS hacks" anytime soon. But > of course; this depends on how we define "hacks", so it's well worth > trying. That sentance leaves too many doors opened so I won't go there, but FWIW, I don't agree with you ;) > I find the extensive use of @import from within documents a bit > code-heavy and limiting. > Would like to see variations that'll lead to the same, more or less, > hack-free results. > I prefer to do as much @import branching as I can from within the > stylesheets, and use link elements in the document-head. One set of If you do this as a means to serve different rules to different browsers then you end up using CSS filters inside the style sheets. Also, IMHO, importing sheets through styles sheets doesn't help maintainability since rules in the sheet override rules in the imported styles sheets. It's one more layer to the cascade, redundant rules, etc... I believe this technique is good to split a sheet into different sections though (layout, etc.). > @import in CSS is easier to maintain than having them spread across > several hundred pages. ? Don't you use Includes? Regards Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
