Hi David, Interesting to see how our variable naming has changed over the years.
Thanks for your excellent post. I’ll just add one little bit if I may. Having worked in the javascript environment for quite some time now, I tend to leave out the “_” wherever I possibly can and use CamelCase instead. so for me $subscriber_recipient becomes $subscriberRecipient. Somehow I find the latter easier to read. Also I tend to have all my modules in components these days so I have been leaving off the module name. But I’ve recently found a flaw in this approach. Often I want to bring my component code back into the host database to make it easier for testing and development. So bingo when I do, I have naming conflicts all over the place. As a result, I’m going back to what I should have done all along – add the module name to the variable!! Best regards Chris Curnow 4cast.com.au<http://4cast.com.au> On 24 Feb. 2017, at 2:29 pm, David Adams via 4D_Tech <4d_tech@lists.4d.com<mailto:4d_tech@lists.4d.com>> wrote: ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************