Am Samstag, den 01.08.2009, 17:41 +0200 schrieb Mathias Krause:

> First of all. I installed the amd64 version of 64studio, as I didn' t 
> read enough to know, that 32 bit version might still be better when 
> using VSTs... but maybe there's a chance to get it working?

I know you haven't asked the list to read something like this, but since
you seem to be a newbie to Linux(-Audio)... 

Start with the native stuff! Try it out, give it a chance!

Don't get me wrong: I don't say this, because I think that you as a
newbie can not be a member of the exclusive Linux-Audio-Gurus that are
allowed to handle VST on Linux. I just guess that you haven't had the
time to get an idea, how powerful LADSPA really is.

Using the WINE-stuff can really be a pain in the ass! (FST and all this
is based on WINE.) WINE is amazing - but it's not a 100%-substitute for
a native Windows-Environment. This goes for all Windows-applications -
but especially in a realtime environment!

So, this is my advice: Only, if your not satisfied with the native
Linux-Audio tools or if your whole work depends on one certain sound of
a VST-Plugin that can not be substituted by LADSPA and friends - go for
FST and stuff. But keep in mind: Although the WINE-project is doing a
great job, the Windows-application you want to integrate in Linux will
always be a "Fremdkörper". (For all those, who are not familiar with the
german language: It's like an alien element.)

My opinion is this: If you want to use VST, go for Windows or Mac OS.
(Keep in mind, that my opinion is not representative for the
list... :) )

Sorry, I wasn't helpful with your very problem, but you might have
guessed that I'm not using VST on Linux (and never did) and therefore I
simply can't help you because I don't know nothing about it...

By the way: I'm happy not to use VST... ;)

Greetings
Mitsch

_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to