I wasn't able to get to that outline. Is the URL correct?

Thanks,

Arnold

"sirjofri via 9fans" <[email protected]> wrote:

> 02.06.2025 22:50:17 Paul Lalonde <[email protected]>:
>
> > Stanley writes:
> >
> > but how do we transmit deep knowledge of strange computing concepts that 
> > experience teaches are rarely happily received (new users always know 
> > better, and/or demand their favorite tools) without inducing the candidate 
> > to read?
> >
> > I posit that it is easier for many users to engage with the documentation, 
> > position papers, and other materials from a position in which they have a 
> > working system in front of them on which to try out the concepts that are 
> > being described in the papers.
> > Read a bit, install a system, try a bit, read a bit more, try a bit more, 
> > dig into some code, which magically is there and findable with the 'src' 
> > command, which they just read about.
> 
> That's what I roughly had planned with my "serious guide to plan 9". Turns 
> out I'm not a writer, even though I enjoy it.
> 
> Here's the rough outline I wrote many months ago. If I go back to that, I 
> should revise that. 
> https://shithub.us/sirjofri/sergui/64335a8573bd09fd01220bd1386d1754f4c14ed3/text/f.html
> 
> sirjofri

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: 
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tbe8e5fda6ae62f5c-M8cc0ba24026d674a55cc17f4
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

Reply via email to