Conversion involves a wee bit of logistics, but it would help if you described your setup.
Are you using ITK for anything else other than the Active4D webserver. Is the webserver running on 4D Server, 4D Standalone, 4D Client etc. For the most part, I did my development on a version of the database using ITK, and the moved the .A4D files over to the production server that was using 4Ds webserver. Seamless, in my experience.. but always, test off-production first.. Using insider, replacing the ITK-A4D shell with the 4D Web-A4D shell was easy.. Hope someone else can chime in with any gotchas.. --- Bill McCarvell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the tip. Other than cost, are there > significant advantages/ > disadvantages of itk vs 4D web server? And is there > any significant > issues/troubles converting over? Is there a thread > that discusses > this after 4D 2003 came out? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > ---------------------------- > Bill McCarvell > Syntaxis On-Line Inc. > www.syntaxis.net > Phone: (519) 472-4700 > Cellphone email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cell: (519) 872-3300 sincerely, mehboob alam "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full." Henry Kissinger _______________________________________________ Active4D-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/mailman/listinfo/active4d-dev Archives: http://mailman.aparajitaworld.com/archive/active4d-dev/
