Phew, ignorance is bliss mate 

I feel angry about that 

Tsk :-)

Sent from an iPhone

On 28 Jul 2010, at 21:50, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:

> enlightenment is not a personal thing. 
> once it happens, the one who is enlightened will automatically join the 
> enlightened club. 
> There is only one such club. 
> Either you are in or you are automatically a part of the ignorance club.  
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am an ignorant idiot who wishes to remain ignorant. That is enlightenment 
> for me.
> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
> 
> From: roomsearching <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:24:41 +0100
> To: <[email protected]>
> Cc: Advaita<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ignorance implies subject and object
> 
> Are you saying that you do not agree with Ramana ?
> 
> Then why are you interested in Advaita ?
> 
> Well, then just admit that you are an ignorant idiot who wishes to remain 
> ignorant. 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are as many selves as you want to imagine. As many as their definitions.
> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
> 
> From: roomsearching <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:09:58 +0100
> To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]>
> Subject: ignorance implies subject and object
> 
> Dr. Syed: Sri Bhagavan says that the Heart is the Self. Psychology has
> it that malice, envy, jealousy and all passions have their seat in the
> heart. How are these two statements to be reconciled?
> M.: The whole cosmos is contained in one pinhole in the Heart. These
> passions are part of the cosmos. They are avidya (ignorance).
> D.: How did avidya arise?
> M.: Avidya is like Maya [she who is not is maya (illusion)]. Similarly
> that which is not is ignorance. Therefore the question does not
> arise. Nevertheless, the question is asked. Then ask, “Whose is the
> avidya? Avidya is ignorance. It implies subject and object. Become
> the subject and there will be no object.
> D.: What is avidya?
> M.: Ignorance of Self. Who is ignorant of the Self? The self must be
> ignorant of Self. Are there two selves? 
> 
> 

Reply via email to