Puntastic 

Clever twist there

Ignoranus - that's funny :-)

Stupid arsehole?

Sent from an iPhone

On 29 Jul 2010, at 06:12, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:

> there has to be a masturbator and the act of masturbation which implies 
> subject and object you ignoranus! 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:11 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Masturbation implies subject only.
> : )
> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
> 
> From: roomsearching <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:07:39 +0100
> To: Mark Ty-Wharton<[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>; 
> Advaita<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: ignorance implies subject and object
> 
> sometimes masturbation can be bliss.
> but since masturbation implies subject and object, it is an illusion. 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Phew, ignorance is bliss mate 
> 
> I feel angry about that 
> 
> Tsk :-)
> 
> Sent from an iPhone
> 
> On 28 Jul 2010, at 21:50, roomsearching <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> enlightenment is not a personal thing. 
>> once it happens, the one who is enlightened will automatically join the 
>> enlightened club. 
>> There is only one such club. 
>> Either you are in or you are automatically a part of the ignorance club.  
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I am an ignorant idiot who wishes to remain ignorant. That is enlightenment 
>> for me.
>> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
>> 
>> From: roomsearching <[email protected]>
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:24:41 +0100
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Advaita<[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: ignorance implies subject and object
>> 
>> Are you saying that you do not agree with Ramana ?
>> 
>> Then why are you interested in Advaita ?
>> 
>> Well, then just admit that you are an ignorant idiot who wishes to remain 
>> ignorant. 
>> 
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:16 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There are as many selves as you want to imagine. As many as their 
>> definitions.
>> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
>> 
>> From: roomsearching <[email protected]>
>> Sender: [email protected]
>> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:09:58 +0100
>> To: Advaita-Zen<[email protected]>
>> Subject: ignorance implies subject and object
>> 
>> Dr. Syed: Sri Bhagavan says that the Heart is the Self. Psychology has
>> it that malice, envy, jealousy and all passions have their seat in the
>> heart. How are these two statements to be reconciled?
>> M.: The whole cosmos is contained in one pinhole in the Heart. These
>> passions are part of the cosmos. They are avidya (ignorance).
>> D.: How did avidya arise?
>> M.: Avidya is like Maya [she who is not is maya (illusion)]. Similarly
>> that which is not is ignorance. Therefore the question does not
>> arise. Nevertheless, the question is asked. Then ask, “Whose is the
>> avidya? Avidya is ignorance. It implies subject and object. Become
>> the subject and there will be no object.
>> D.: What is avidya?
>> M.: Ignorance of Self. Who is ignorant of the Self? The self must be
>> ignorant of Self. Are there two selves? 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to