Yes very clever - and how does saying that move the conversation forward? Sent from an iPhone
On 31 Jul 2010, at 20:25, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: > The thing is,Mark,is that consciousness is the thing you're saying is > not a thing. > > > > > On Jul 31, 2:14 pm, Mark Ty-Wharton <[email protected]> wrote: >> My Internet analogy answers all these question - consciousness is not a >> thing - there are things which provide a structure of existence for >> consciousness - negate all those as not being you and you might find >> yourself :-) >> >> Sent from an iPhone >> >> On 31 Jul 2010, at 12:02, Rodger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> How can I say awareness is if I cannot percept it? >> >>> How can I percept it if it is not a something? >> >>> How can I discuss awareness if it is not a thing I percept? >> >>> For something to be 'percepted' it must be. >> >>> How can I say awareness? WHY do I say awareness? >> >>> On Jul 31, 1:10 am, [email protected] wrote: >>>> And what is not? >>>> For something to be it must be percepted. >>>> So how can I say awareness IS if I cannot percept it? >>>> I can percept the thought that awareness does the perception but awareness >>>> itself cannot be percepted, right? >>>> Sent via BlackBerry from Vodafone
