On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > do you really think that conjurer-tricksters are > capable of Shakti transmission? >
Not at all. Only capable of convincing the receiver that he/she has been transmitted something. The essence of a good con is to bring the victim to the state of a conviction that even if it is a con, the victim's own sense of identity/esteem will not allow the victim to accept being the victim of a con. Franklin learnt the tricks of the trade from another con-master Muktananda. And then there was a falling out between the two on the dividing of the women and of the spoils. > > apparently not everyone in India is laughing at Adi Da. > OK. > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCuVN3FU2Hw > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BLsofaZCQs&feature=related > >
