I transmitted something once! Though surprisingly contracted very little...
Amazing ;-) Sent from an iPhone On 13 Oct 2010, at 13:16, San deep <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:44 PM, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > do you really think that conjurer-tricksters are > capable of Shakti transmission? > > > Not at all. > > Only capable of convincing the receiver that he/she has been transmitted > something. > > The essence of a good con is to bring the victim to the state of a conviction > that even if it is a con, the victim's own sense of identity/esteem will not > allow the victim to accept being the victim of a con. > > > Franklin learnt the tricks of the trade from another con-master Muktananda. > > And then there was a falling out between the two on the dividing of the > women and of the spoils. > > > > > apparently not everyone in India is laughing at Adi Da. > > > OK. > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCuVN3FU2Hw > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0BLsofaZCQs&feature=related > >
