Why are we using the term awareness at all?

It's such an ambiguous term with so many meanings

It is synonymous with mindfulness and we are not just the body/mind

At the level of self we arise out of the body mind and are in essence nothing 
definable 

The distinguishable me is just that and no more a distinction!

Both real as distinguishable and distinct from another and not real 

The distinction Mark cannot be separated from the object Mark

One

Anti-Duality?

Dark-Duality?

We know something is out here!

Sent from an iPhone

On 20 Apr 2011, at 08:43, Sandeep-Kuber Technologies 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On 4/20/2011 10:43 AM, godszen wrote:
>> 
>> Sandeep-Kuber Technologies wrote:
>>> Which is why, you-as-you-truly-are can never perceive yourself.
>>> 
>>> Awareness-not-aware-of-itself-as awareness
>> with the help of the human mind
>> awareness can become aware of itself
>> 
>> *self-realization*
>> 
> 
> When a tool is used, all that gets created/achieved/realized/reached is a 
> projection of the tool.
> 
> That's all.
> 
> It may be the most profoundest experience but still a projection of the means 
> that got used in the process.
> 
> 
> 
> The other usual misunderstanding not just by you GZ but by most is about term 
> awareness.
> 
> Awareness is always connoted as awareness of <whatever>.
> 
> And that is why it is accepted to be a synonymous with witnessing.
> 
> Typically it is held that there is no witnesser unless there is         
> something to be witnessed.
> 
> But the as-if-ness of this, as witnessing......may have a sense of a 
> witnesser and the witnessed, but these are all 
> "a sense of" ....there are no , separated, discreted loci, on which these 
> could be perched.
> 
> 
> Which is why the pointing of that primordialness...
> 
> ....as awareness not aware of anything, not itself, nor it's         absence, 
> nor even of the much bandied about...nothingness.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Don't go by the spiel that is being fed to you GZ, in the satsangh circuit 
> that you frequent.
> 
> 
> In and as self-realization, there is neither a self-to-realize, nor a 
> Self-to-be realized, nor any realizing.
> 
> 
> These are the same inducements that a salesman of second-hand         cars 
> use, to sell you a lemon.
> 
> 
> If lemonade is all that you are looking for, sure go for the lemons.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to