.
Thanks Gurubuster, Is that a name or a campaign? It’s great to have purpose, don’t you think even if it is to be a Guru buster. Are you related to the Ghost busters? Sincere apologies for my flippancy, please forgive me. Welcome to our humble discussion group. Our bond is a common battle with logic and reason. Our convention is only the non-duality of all things. “Smile at such passing clouds, which no doubt have a beauty of their own, but still remains vaporware.” Beauty exists in eye of the beholder. Beauty has no external substance because it is created by the individual, enjoyed by the individual and finally destroyed by the individual. The example of beauty is indicative of so much of what we perceive within the present. In some human circles it is suggest that what we see in our surrounding phenomenons is a reflection of what we have inside. A tuff call because it reminds us of how, to a greater degree we are wholly responsible for the feelings we experience. Love, beauty, happiness or sadness. These things only make manifest inside the conditional circumstance known as the self. Taking full control of the self one can chooses to see beauty in the clouds, or one can choose to see the beauty in all things. Some may choose to see nothing or even ugliness in all things, such is the nature of the illusion of self. Vaporware is a choice …………. Choose wisely. . On Apr 21, 7:36 am, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > and from what point of view > > do these assertions come from? > > On Apr 20, 11:27 pm, Gurubuster <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Apr 21, 3:58 am, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > hehehe........ > > > > I don't believe anything anybody says..... > > > > I only know what I experience first-hand, > > > OK. > > > Now get over it. > > > If an experence is known, then that hoopla is only the projection of > > the known. > > > That which can never get recorded within and by memory(known), and > > since memory/recall from memory is the mere play of thought..... > > > .....that which thought cannot touch, (thought can only be the > > footprints reaching the shore)..... > > > ...that, can never be an experience, first hand or second hand. > > > For that cannot be even "that-ed" > > > (i.e.referenced/elluded/hinted/pointed...et al) > > > All referencing, all elluding, all hinting, all pointing...and all > > experiences on which are based all these propounded stories... .. > > > ..akin the banter of two characters in your last night sleep dream > > GZ , debating on the length of your nostrils. > > > > and being able to literally get into another person's > > > mind, and see/experience their self/consciousness/mind > > > with them, I have seen awareness, aware of itself, > > > Great experience. > > > Projected from the belief that there is another separated, apart > > person/object, discreeted at a stand alone locus, ..........into which > > a getting into is a possibility. > > > The object popularly known as GZ itself cannot be isolated at a > > locus... > > > .. ergo....... what other-than-GZ- person ......and what entering into > > this other-than-GZ- person's mind. > > > Smile at such passing clouds, which no doubt have a beauty of their > > own, but still remains vaporware.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
