and from what point of view do these assertions come from?
On Apr 20, 11:27 pm, Gurubuster <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 21, 3:58 am, godszen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hehehe........ > > > I don't believe anything anybody says..... > > > I only know what I experience first-hand, > > OK. > > Now get over it. > > If an experence is known, then that hoopla is only the projection of > the known. > > That which can never get recorded within and by memory(known), and > since memory/recall from memory is the mere play of thought..... > > .....that which thought cannot touch, (thought can only be the > footprints reaching the shore)..... > > ...that, can never be an experience, first hand or second hand. > > For that cannot be even "that-ed" > > (i.e.referenced/elluded/hinted/pointed...et al) > > All referencing, all elluding, all hinting, all pointing...and all > experiences on which are based all these propounded stories... .. > > ..akin the banter of two characters in your last night sleep dream > GZ , debating on the length of your nostrils. > > > > > and being able to literally get into another person's > > mind, and see/experience their self/consciousness/mind > > with them, I have seen awareness, aware of itself, > > Great experience. > > Projected from the belief that there is another separated, apart > person/object, discreeted at a stand alone locus, ..........into which > a getting into is a possibility. > > The object popularly known as GZ itself cannot be isolated at a > locus... > > .. ergo....... what other-than-GZ- person ......and what entering into > this other-than-GZ- person's mind. > > Smile at such passing clouds, which no doubt have a beauty of their > own, but still remains vaporware.
